I Shrinking a polygon -- calculation logic

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobinCris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric Polygon
RobinCris
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working on a project of modeling building for greenBuilding.

for the simulation, I need to put the vertices for the outside of the flat external wall, the the centeral of the wall between flats.

For this, I am doing great and I also calculated the area.

But I also need the NET floor area by reducing the walls thickness.

Not all the wall have the same thickness but I do know this

1. the Gross area
2. the thickness of each wall
3. the length of each wall
4. the vertices for the bigger polygon

How can I substract the walls from the Gross to get the NET floor area
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RobinCris said:
for the simulation, I need to put the vertices for the outside of the flat external wall, the the centeral of the wall between flats.

For this, I am doing great and I also calculated the area.
RobinCris said:
How can I substract the walls from the Gross to get the NET floor area
How about just making new walls with the external vertices where the inside vertices of the first walls are? That should give you the internal area that you want, no?

Do you have any plots of your work to help us visualize what you are doing?
 
RobinCris said:
How can I substract the walls from the Gross to get the NET floor area
  • Calcuate the area for each wall assuming it is a simple rectangle (i.e. length x thickness) and deduct it from the gross external area.
  • Add back the areas you have counted twice where walls 'overlap' in the corners (if you have any internal corners draw a sketch and think about how they are different from external corners). If you have any corners that are not right angles, again think about these carefully with a sketch.
Note that what you are looking for is usually called the gross internal area (GIA), not the net floor area.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top