Sign convention of bolometric correction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the sign convention of bolometric correction (BC) in astronomy, highlighting the confusion surrounding its definition and application. Two primary zero-points exist: one defines the Sun with zero bolometric correction, while the other establishes a positive BC for all stars, reflecting their energy emissions beyond the visual spectrum. The discrepancy arises from different definitions, with some sources like Wikipedia using BC = Mb - Mv, and others like Wolfram Science World using BC = Mv - Mb. Ultimately, the sign of the BC depends on the convention adopted by the astronomer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bolometric and visual magnitudes in astronomy
  • Familiarity with the concept of radiant flux across different wavelengths
  • Knowledge of the definitions and calculations of bolometric correction
  • Awareness of the differences in scientific conventions and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definitions and applications of bolometric correction in various astronomical contexts
  • Explore the implications of different zero-points for bolometric correction in stellar classification
  • Study the relationship between stellar temperature and energy emissions across wavelengths
  • Investigate how bolometric correction affects the interpretation of stellar luminosity and distance
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying stellar properties and photometry will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the nuances of bolometric correction and its implications in astronomical research.

phenolic
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Okay I realize that stars emit at least some radiation outside the visual range but I have seen stars with positive BC when I thought that most values are negative due to the radiant flux over all wavelengths being greater than its flux over a certain wavelength. Is the sign of the BC the same for any star? I think I am getting lost somewhere...any input? Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not an expert on the subject, but I found this: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O80-bolometriccorrection.html

The difference between the visual and bolometric magnitudes of an object. Two zero-points are in use, which differ by 0.07 mag. One defines the Sun to have zero bolometric correction. The other has its zero-point set so that bolometric corrections for all stars are positive; this is because other stars emit more energy than the Sun at non-visual wavelengths, either in the ultraviolet for hotter stars or the infrared for cooler stars. Confusingly, some authorities define bolometric correction as bolometric magnitude minus visual magnitude, which makes all values negative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay..the othermore straightforward question why is the bolometric correction always positive? Wouldn't the bolometric correction be negative since the bolometric magnitude is smaller than the visual magnitude
 
Well it just all depends on what sign convention people are using. And... it seems like different people use different things. For example, wikipedia uses BC = Mb - Mv, whereas scienceworld.wolfram.com uses BC = Mv - Mb. I don't know what the standard is generally in astronomy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
516
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K