Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Significant correlation, not significant coefficient

  1. Apr 30, 2017 #1
    A couple of questions today. First. I am running a panel data regression test. First I check the correlations between the independent variables and the dependent variable. these are the results.

    The D/(D+Em) is the dependent variable, and the independent are the 4 variables most adjacent. Disregard the two outer variables (the red area). The independent variable "Anleggsmidler/eiendeler" has a correlation coefficient (pearson's) to the dependent variable of ,177 and this is a very significant result as you can see. However, when I do the regression analysis (as shown below), the relation between "Anleggsmidler/eiendeler" and the dependent variable is not significant at all. How come the results are so different in terms of significance?

    Second question is is there any command to include standardised coefficients to fixed effects regression results in stata? the beta command does not work when I use fixed effects regression (i am pretty green when it comes to Stata). Any advice on these two questions? Thanks in advance!
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 30, 2017 #2


    Staff: Mentor

    You have pretty substantial multicolinearity in this data. The estimates of individual coefficients will be unreliable in the regression.
  4. Apr 30, 2017 #3
    hey. I used a VIF-test and it produced the following numbers: I understand that it differs what is regarded as acceptable, but as far as I know, below 10 is usually no disaster (based on google searches, not on my acumen).

    Variable VIF 1/VIF
    lndriftsin~r 5.72 0.174921
    anleggsmid~r 5.02 0.199399
    totalrenta~t 1.34 0.743779
    markedbok 1.18 0.845347
    Mean VIF 3.31
  5. Apr 30, 2017 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    By the time the (estimated) effects of the other variables are taken into account, there is not enough left for Anleggsmidler/eiendeler to be statistically significant. It should be removed from the model and the linear regression should be re-run without it.
  6. Apr 30, 2017 #5


    Staff: Mentor

    Instead, just try running a reduced model deleting totalrentabilitat
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted