Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm currently in a differential equations course, and we are learning how to solve exact equations in the form of Mdx + Ndy = 0.

I immediately recognized this from my vector calculus class as it was used to find a potential function of a vector field (assuming the vector field was conservative). We integrated both M dx and N dy, combined them on a term by term basis and came up with a potential function.

In differential equations we start to do the same thing but then we set the resulting function from integration equal to N (or M, whichever one we didn't integrate).

I was just wondering if both of these processes have the same end goal and/or are interchangeable. If they aren't interchangeable why are they different? Seems like we get a function as an answer to each problem. The problems seem to slightly deviate from each other but I was wondering if this is just my professor's style. Thanks in advance,

Lee

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Similarity between exact equations and potential functions

Loading...

Similar Threads - Similarity between exact | Date |
---|---|

A 2nd Order PDE Using Similarity Method | May 14, 2017 |

I Difference between Wronskian and other methods | Dec 6, 2016 |

Undoing Similarity Transforms | Jun 30, 2015 |

Similarity Solutions | Jan 25, 2015 |

Solutions to 2 similar ODE's. Why does they differ that much? | Nov 18, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**