Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simple notation question about subsequences

  1. May 7, 2013 #1
    Hey guys,
    I was just reading notes on metric spaces and was wondering if the notation of subsequences was such that anm is always further down the original sequence than an? For example suppose you have a strictly decreasing sequnce does the notation imply that anm<an
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 7, 2013 #2

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member


    You have some notation confusion. The correct comparison is anm with am. The nm is supposed to be a sequence of integers n1, n2, etc. and you don't get to specify what n is, you specify what m is. But your intuition is correct, nm ≥ m for all m, so if your sequence is decreasing you would get anm ≤ am
     
  4. May 7, 2013 #3

    Fredrik

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The question doesn't make sense as it's written, but you probably meant ##a_m## when you said ##a_n##. So the question is (I think) if ##n_m\geq m## for all m.

    The answer to that is yes, the map ##m\mapsto n_m## is increasing. If it wasn't, we wouldn't be dealing with a subsequence, but a rearrangement of a subsequence.

    I'm moving the post to general math. Since it's not a question about a textbook-style problem, it doesn't belong in homework, and since you're not asking about convergence, it doesn't really belong in topology & analysis either.

    Edit: I didn't see Office_Shredder's post until after I had finished mine.
     
  5. May 7, 2013 #4
    Thanks guys.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Simple notation question about subsequences
Loading...