How Does the Sign of a Permutation Product Relate to Its Components?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the sign of a permutation product and its components within the symmetric group S_N. It defines the determinant function Δ and how it transforms under permutations, establishing that the sign function sgn indicates whether the permutation preserves or reverses the order of Δ. The proof shows that for any two permutations σ and π, the sign of their composition is the product of their individual signs, expressed as sgn(σ ∘ π) = sgn(σ) sgn(π). Specific cases are analyzed where the determinant remains unchanged or changes sign, leading to conclusions about the signs of the permutations involved. This establishes a fundamental property of permutation signs in relation to their composition.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Consider
S_N = \left\{ {\left. {\sigma :\left\{ {1, \ldots ,N} \right\} \to \left\{ {1, \ldots ,N} \right\}} \right|\sigma {\text{ is a bijection}}} \right\}
i.e., the set of all permutations on 'N' values.

Define
\Delta \left( {x_1 , \ldots ,x_N } \right) = \prod\limits_{i < j} {\left( {x_i - x_j } \right)}
and, for \sigma \in S_N,
\sigma \left( \Delta \right)\left( {x_1 , \ldots ,x_N } \right) = \prod\limits_{i < j} {\left( {x_{\sigma \left( i \right)} - x_{\sigma \left( j \right)} } \right)}

Also, define {\mathop{\rm sgn}} : S_N \to \left\{ {\pm 1} \right\} as
{\mathop{\rm sgn}} \left( \sigma \right) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l}<br /> 1,\;\sigma \left( \Delta \right) = \Delta \\ <br /> - 1,\;\sigma \left( \Delta \right) = - \Delta \\ <br /> \end{array} \right.

How do I prove that, for \sigma ,\pi \in S_N,
{\mathop{\rm sgn}} \left( {\sigma \circ \pi } \right) = {\mathop{\rm sgn}} \left( \sigma \right){\mathop{\rm sgn}} \left( \pi \right) \; ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sgn(sigma o pi)=1
then sigma(pi(delta))=delta
if pi(delta)=delta then sigma(delta)=delta so both sgn are 1.
if pi(delta)=-delta sigma(-delta)=delta, which is the same as sigma(delta)=-delta, you can see it by obserivng that sigma(delta)+sigma(-delta)=0.
the same goes when sgn (sigma(pi))=-1.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K