MHB Simple Simultaneous equation help

  • Thread starter Thread starter nacho-man
  • Start date Start date
nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Assuming $x_1, x_2 \geq 0, \lambda \neq 0, w_1,w_2 > 0$

We have the equalities:

$$w_1 - \lambda x_2 = 0 ... (1)$$
$$w_2 - \lambda x_1 = 0 ... (2)$$
$$\bar y - x_1x_2= 0 ... (3)$$

My solutions say that $\lambda^* = \sqrt\frac{w_1w_2}{\bar y}$
Which I was able to solve myself.

The other solution is $x^* = (\frac{w_2 \bar y}{w_1}, \frac{w_1 \bar y}{w_2})$

Which I cannot seem to get. Would anyone be so kind as to point out how to obtain solutions for $x^*$ ?

I tried:

$x_1= \frac{w_2}{\lambda}$ and $x_2 = \frac{w_1}{\lambda}$

then put these into the 3rd equation, but ended up gettig
$\bar y = \frac{w_1w_2}{\lambda^2}$ which I couldn't see turning into what I needed either way - even just subbing in one of the x-values at a time, but to no avail.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anyone? :(

If I wasn't clear, $x^* = (x_1,x_2)$
 
Hi nacho,

The square root signs are missing in the answer for $x^*$. It should be $x^* = (\sqrt{w_2 \bar{y}/w_1}, \sqrt{w_1\bar{y}/w_2})$.
 
this was a suspicion of mine - thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top