I Simpler Brunnian "rubberband" loops?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter egmoen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knot theory Loops
egmoen
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Depictions of Brunnian "rubberband" loops show inividual elements being joined in a way that requires 8 crossings per pair; it seems like if we use lark's-head knots we reduce this to 6.
The standard configuration of Brunnian "rubberband" loops shows a series of unknots each bent into a U-shape, with their ends looped around the middle of the next unknot. (See for instance http://katlas.math.toronto.edu/wiki/"Rubberband"_Brunnian_Links). This connection requires 8 crossings.

If we connect the unknots together using a simpler lark's-head (cow hitch) knot, we still get a set of Brunnian links, since removing any element causes the entire structure to fall apart. But this is much simpler than the method shown above. It requires only 6 crossings per pair, and means that a radial cut through the overall structure only needs to sever two bights, not four. (A picture of a non-Brunnian chain using lark's-head knots can be found here: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/rubber-bands.html)

Since I can't find an earlier description of this possibility, I'm worried that I have missed something that might disqualify this approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's what I'm visualizing. If this works and doesn't have a name yet, it should definitely be called "an exaltation of larks", right?
exaltation.png
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
I do not have good answer, but this is both fun and interesting.

This is the only compendium I can see, likely due to paywalls.

http://katlas.org/wiki/Brunnian_link
 
Yeah, I saw the katlas page...not much on there.

But would you agree that the loop above can't be separated without cutting an element, and falls apart if you cut any element?
 
So it seems. But as to being a unique Brunnian knot, I do not know. These constructs are sometimes called "rubberband" knots. Make one for yourself and play with it. Maybe one of the mathematicians here knows something more substantial.

@mathwonk @lavinia @fresh_42 seem like possibilities.

I think you may have already found https://www.knotplot.com/ which let's you play around with knot construction.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top