- #1

- 49

- 1

(n/2)!/[(n+2)/2]!

I get,

2[n(n-1)]/2[(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)]

cancelling the 2[n(n-1)]

leaves me with 1/[(n+2)(n+1)]

However, Wolfram Alpha tells me this can be simplified as 2/(n+2) and I don't see that.

Thanks

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter hnicholls
- Start date

- #1

- 49

- 1

(n/2)!/[(n+2)/2]!

I get,

2[n(n-1)]/2[(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)]

cancelling the 2[n(n-1)]

leaves me with 1/[(n+2)(n+1)]

However, Wolfram Alpha tells me this can be simplified as 2/(n+2) and I don't see that.

Thanks

- #2

- 16,808

- 7,574

(n/2)!/[(n+2)/2]!

I get,

2[n(n-1)]/2[(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)]

cancelling the 2[n(n-1)]

leaves me with 1/[(n+2)(n+1)]

However, Wolfram Alpha tells me this can be simplified as 2/(n+2) and I don't see that.

Thanks

simplify by using k = (n/2)! and go from there. It falls out rather easily.

- #3

- 49

- 1

I'm not clear how a substitution of k = (n/2)! would help.

- #4

- 16,808

- 7,574

How much is (k+1)! ?

- #5

- 49

- 1

(k+1)k(k-1)(k-2) etc.

- #6

- 16,808

- 7,574

You are REALLY making all this a lot harder than it needs to be at every step of the way.(k+1)k(k-1)(k-2) etc.

- #7

- #8

ehild

Homework Helper

- 15,543

- 1,909

simplify by using k = (n/2)! and go from there. It falls out rather easily.

Write (n+2)/ 2 = n/2 +1. So you have ##\frac {(n/2)!}{(n/2+1)!}##I am trying to work through a simplication of this factorial with variables:

(n/2)!/[(n+2)/2]!

How are k! and (k+1)! related?

- #9

- 16,808

- 7,574

No, what I meant was exactly the hint that ehild made more explicit. It's irrelevant for this step that you have set K = n/2, as that has no bearing on the simplification once you've replaced n/2 with K. Sure, once you've done the simplification, you have to put n/2 back in place of K but again, that's irrelevant to the simplification.I guess what @phinds means is "How much is (k+1)! when k = n/2?"

ehild has combined my two hints. I think at this point, there just isn't any way to GIVE any further hints without just spoon feeding the answer which is what we've all been trying to avoid.

- #10

- 22,089

- 3,296

- #11

- 16,808

- 7,574

Sure, but that has no bearing on this problem. Do the simplification that I suggested and you'll see that the factorial falls out completely so your point, while true, is irrelevant to this problem. That is, the original statement DOES in fact have an invalid term, as you point out, but so what if it falls out by simplification?

- #12

- 22,089

- 3,296

Sure, but that has no bearing on this problem. Do the simplification that I suggested and you'll see that the factorial falls out completely so your point, while true, is irrelevant to this problem. That is, the original statement DOES in fact have an invalid term, as you point out, but so what if it falls out by simplification?

So you think it's a good thing that something invalid is equal to something valid? That's not how math works.

- #13

- 16,808

- 7,574

No, I understand what you're saying but I think this is an exercise in simplification.So you think it's a good thing that something invalid is equal to something valid? That's not how math works.

- #14

- 49

- 1

(n/2)! = (n/2)(n/2 - 2/2) = (n/2)[(n-2)/2]

[(n+2)/2]! = [(n+2)/2][(n+2)/2 - 2/2][(n+2)/2 - 4/2] = [(n+2)/2][(n/2][(n- 2)/2]

cancel out the (n/2)[(n-2)/2] and you are left with 1/[(n+2)/2] or 2/(n+2)

Thanks DrClaude. The last point was a BIG help.

Henry

Share: