Simplifying a Limit with Factorization | Quick Help for Lim Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter bayan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To evaluate the limit lim x-->3 (2x^2-x-15)/(3x^2-13x+12), the correct factorization of the numerator is (2x+5)(x-3), indicating that x=3 is a root. After factorization, the term (x-3) cancels with the denominator, allowing for direct substitution of x=3. This results in the limit evaluating to 11/5, or 2 1/5. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper factorization and simplification in limit problems.
bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Hey every one!

I have been doing some lim questions and I came across this one.

Evaluate: lim x-->3 (2x^2-x-15/3x^2-13x+12)

I have Factorised It and got

lim x-->3 ( (x-8) (x+7) / (-3x+4) (-x+3) )

How do I go about the rest?Have I used the right stuff?

Sorru for the mess. I don't really know how to use the latex :redface:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You've not factored the top properly. If that were the correct factorization then the limit wouldn't exist. However, 2x^2 - x -15 evaluates to zero at x=3, so x-3 must be one of the factors., which will cancel with the factor or x-3 on the bottom.
 
thanx!


I see my problem now :)
 
After Factorising I would just substitude the x-->3 into the equation wouldn't I?

Or do I have to use the f(x+h)-f(x)/h? (not too sure about formula too:( I'm feeling kinda sleeeeepppy)
 
Nope,u'd simplify through the common monom (x-3) and then take the limit...

Daniel.
 
I think I need more explenation.

After canceling (x-3) from top and bottom do I just change the value of x=3? That is what I currently have done! And got 6+5/9-4=11/5=2 1/5
 
That's right.The limit in that case means plugging the value "x=3" in the remaining fraction.

Daniel.
 
Thanx.

Sorry to bother you, But I really apriciate the help.
 
Factorising 2X^2-X-15 gives
(2X+5)(X-3)

Therefore:
X=3 or
X=-5/2
 
  • #10
We don't need the second value (-5/2).Jus that "3" was important,because it got simplified with the one in the denominator.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K