MHB Simplifying a rational expression

hollywalker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am having difficulty solving my math problems.

Simplify the expression:
(12+r-r^2)/(r^3 +3r^2)

The answer is (4-r)/r^2

I know that i can expand 12+r-r^2 as (-r+4)(r+3)
But i cannot figure out the rest. Please help me. Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hollywalker said:
Hello,
I am having difficulty solving my math problems.

Simplify the expression:
(12+r-r^2)/(r^3 +3r^2)

The answer is (4-r)/r^2

I know that i can expand 12+r-r^2 as (-r+4)(r+3)
But i cannot figure out the rest. Please help me. Thanks

(Wave)

$$-r^2+r+12=0$$

$$\Delta=b^2-4ac=1-4 (-1 \cdot 12)=1+48=49$$

$$r_{1,2}=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{\Delta}}{2a}=\frac{-1 \pm 7}{-2}=4,-3$$

So,the expression can be written like that:

$$\frac{12+r-r^2}{r^3+3r^2}=\frac{-(r-4) \cdot (r+3)}{r^2 \cdot (r+3)}=\frac{-(r-4)}{r^2}=\frac{4-r}{r^2}$$
 
Hello, hollywalker!

Simplify: .\frac{12+r-r^2}{r^3 +3r^2}
Factor the numerator: 12+r-r^2 \:=\: (3+r)(4-r)
Factor the denominator: r^3 + 3r^2 \:=\:r^2(r+3)

The fraction becomes: .\frac{(3+r)(4-r)}{r^2(r+3)}

Reduce: .\frac{\cancel{(3+r)}(4-r)}{r^2\cancel{(r+3)}} \;=\;\frac{4-r}{r^2}
 
Also note that if you're crossing $(r+3)$ from the top and bottom, then $r \ne -3$.
 
Hi hollywalker, welcome to MHB!:)

I have moved your topic to a more appropriate sub-forum, and given a new title to it to indicate the nature of the question being asked.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top