Simulating physics: the current status of lattice field theories

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of simulating quantum field theories on lattices, particularly fermionic fields, as highlighted by David Tong's reference to the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem. This theorem states that simulating a fermionic field on a lattice while maintaining locality, Hermiticity, and translation invariance requires the introduction of extra fermions. However, participants argue that while chirality is indeed problematic, locality and Hermiticity can be preserved using methods like Wilson fermions, which involve fine-tuning. The conversation emphasizes that the Standard Model is viewed as an effective field theory, with numerical simulations focusing on producing accurate long-range correlation functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with lattice field theory methodologies
  • Knowledge of the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem
  • Experience with Wilson fermions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem on lattice simulations
  • Study the properties and applications of Wilson fermions in lattice field theories
  • Explore Susskind's staggered fermion model and its deviations from the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem
  • Investigate numerical methods for simulating long-range correlation functions in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, computational scientists, and researchers involved in quantum field theory simulations, particularly those focusing on lattice methods and fermionic fields.

ErikZorkin
Messages
104
Reaction score
6
I recently watched this video by David Tong on computer simulation of quantum fields on lattices, fermionic fields in particular. He said it was impossible to simulate a fermionic field on a lattice so that the action be local, Hermitian and translation-invariant unless extra fermions get introduced. This is known as the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem.
David Tong mentioned that simulating physics (to be precise, quantum field theories) remains one the most challenging problems of physics and just a handful of people are currently working on it.

Question: what is currently the most accepted method of simulating a lattice field theory? In particular, what conditions of the said theorem does the Susskind's staggered fermion model discard and what is the physical implications?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
ErikZorkin said:
He said it was impossible to simulate a fermionic field on a lattice so that the action be local, Hermitian and translation-invariant unless extra fermions get introduced. This is known as the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem.
I don't think that's exactly true. What is impossible is to make the action chiral, but locality and hermiticity should not be a problem. Translation invariance is violated on lattice by definition, I think no one even tries to avoid it. My favored method for dealing with the problem of lattice fermions is the Wilson fermions, which requires fine tuning but I don't think it's such a big problem.

For more details see also Tong's lectures https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gaugetheory.html Sec. 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, atyy, PeroK and 3 others
Thanks for the pointers. I enjoy Tong's videos, but I find the particular emphasis on the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem misplaced. I don't consider any fields of the Standard Model fundamental; the Standard Model is an effective field theory sharing "long" wavelength features with the true theory (which we do not yet have). There's no problem at all with Fermion doubling, since the lattice itself is an approximation. All that matters is that the numerical simulations produce reasonable "long" range correlation functions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K