Simultaneous Equations Alternate Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving simultaneous equations using an alternate approach. The original equations, (55x + 45y) = 520 and (45x + 55y) = 480, were simplified to (11x + 9y) = 104 and (9x + 11y) = 96. The solution was found by manipulating the equations through subtraction, yielding x = 7 and y = 3. Various methods were discussed, including Cramer's rule and graphing, with an emphasis on the importance of recognizing patterns in the equations for efficient problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simultaneous equations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of Cramer's rule
  • Basic graphing skills for linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Cramer's rule for solving linear systems
  • Learn about graphing techniques for simultaneous equations
  • Explore methods for recognizing patterns in algebraic equations
  • Investigate the use of light cone coordinates in mathematical transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in algebra, particularly in solving simultaneous equations efficiently.

hackedagainanda
Messages
52
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
Figure out an easy way to solve this pair of equations.

(55x + 45y) = 520
(45x + 55y) = 480
Relevant Equations
(55x + 45y) = 520
(45x + 55y) = 480
(55x + 45y) = 520 (1)
(45x + 55y) = 480 (2)

So first I notice they are divisible by 5 so I go ahead and do that.

(11x + 9y) = 104 (1)
(9x + 11y) = 96 (2)

11 times 9 is 99 and 9 times 11 is 99 so I can cancel some terms. I proceed to do that by multiplying the top by 11 and getting: (121x + 99y) = 1144 and the bottom equation by 9 and I get (81x + 99y) = 864

I then have:
(121x + 99y) = 1144 (1)
(81x + 99y) = 864 (2)

So with the new equations I then subtract equation 2 from 1.

40x = 280, so x = 7.

Substituting x= 7 into the original equation 1 I get 55 x 7 = 385, so I subtract 385 from both sides of the equation and get 45y = 135 which is 135/45 = 3. y = 3

So I now have solved for x and y for both equations, and when I plug them in as values it gives me true equations.

This method seemed easy to me but I can't help wondering did I miss the point of the question, i.e is there a blindingly obvious easier method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"blindingly obvious" -- I don't think so. But there are other approaches just as easy as yours.
 
I think that's a great approach, for this particular problem. It may not be the easiest way in general, for another set of numbers.

That is why I favor methods that always work, even when the coefficients are obnoxious. The more general methods don't require you to be clever, you just have to follow the process, like a computer.

Cramer's rule is a good approach in general, but sometimes not the easiest. Perhaps you haven't studied that yet, but you will.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
The arithmetic is much easier in this problem
if you take first the sum of the given equations, together with the difference of the given equations.

Of course, graphing the equations is another way.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
If you add both equations, you get ##100x+100y=1000##, which is equivalent to ##x+y=10##.
$$55x+45y=520\Leftrightarrow11x+9y=104$$$$45x+55y=480\Leftrightarrow9x+11y=96$$$$x+y=10$$
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
or add and subtract, getting x+y = 10 and x-y = 4, so x=7, y =3.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, etotheipi and archaic
I purposely didn’t finish carrying out the method I suggested above... hoping that OP would do it.

(The motivation of my suggestion (for me) was noticing the similarity with a Lorentz transformation, then using light cone coordinates.)
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
I got the "sum" bit right away ; totally missed "difference". Not any easier than the OP's method, but definitely cleverer.
 
hmmm27 said:
I got the "sum" bit right away ; totally missed "difference". Not any easier than the OP's method, but definitely cleverer.
Really?
No scaling the way done by the OP was needed... since the numbers were nice.
Arithmetic simplifies quickly to what @mathwonk wrote.
 
  • #10
robphy said:
Really?
No scaling the way done by the OP was needed... since the numbers were nice.
Arithmetic simplifies quickly to what @mathwonk wrote.
Yes, but you have to notice that both adding and subtracting the equations are useful, in the first place : the problem is rigged to have a cute answer.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K