Single Slit Interference Pattern: Increased Distance

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the distance between the single slit and the screen results in wider bright fringes and decreased light intensity, making them appear closer together. This phenomenon occurs because the spreading of light reduces the distinction between dark fringes. The discussion raises questions about whether dark fringes actually decrease in size or if this is merely a perceptual effect. Key quantities relevant to this analysis include the wavelength of light and the distance from the slit to the screen. Understanding these factors is essential for accurately describing the interference pattern.
belbin09
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A laser emitting light with a wavelength of 560 nm is directed at a single slit, producing an interference pattern on a screen that is 3.0 m away. The central maximum is 5.0 cm wide.

What would the effect on this pattern be, if the screen was moved further away?
Relevant Equations
Δy = λL/w
ATTEMPT AT SOLUTION

The effect on the pattern when the screen is moved further away is the bright fringes would become wider, the light intensity of the bright fringes would decrease, and the bright fringes will appear closer together.

REASONING

I answered this question based on how light works against a screen in general. The part I get stuck on is how the dark fringes would appear. I state that the bright fringes "appear" closer together because as the distance between the slit and the screen increases the bright fringes would become wider, spreading the light outwards making the dark fringes harder to distinguish. Would the dark fringes actually get smaller or is it just a perception?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 7.57.50 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 7.57.50 PM.png
    10 KB · Views: 132
Physics news on Phys.org
What expressions do you know about where the bright and dark fringes appear? What quantities are relevant? Start from there.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top