Undergrad Can single variable equations always be solved using basic math principles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fascheue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
Click For Summary
Single variable equations cannot always be solved using basic math principles, particularly for polynomials of degree five and higher, where Galois theory indicates that general solutions are not possible. For example, the equation 5 = (x)/(1+x^7) may not have a straightforward solution. While polynomials up to degree four can be solved in closed form, higher-degree equations often require numerical methods like the Newton-Raphson method for approximate solutions. The definition of "solved" varies; if it means expressing solutions in elementary functions, then not all equations can be solved this way. However, numerical solutions exist for many equations, including those involving complex numbers.
Fascheue
Can all equations with a single variable be solved?

5 = (x)/(1+x^7)

How can something like this be solved for example. Sometimes I have equations with one variable and I can’t see any way to solve them with the knowledge of math that I currently have. Is it just that a higher level of math is required to solves problems like the one above or am I missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fascheue said:
Can all equations with a single variable be solved?
No. ##y=xe^x## for example can't.
5 = (x)/(1+x^7)
Not sure about this one. Polynomials up to degree four can be solved in a closed form. Equations of higher degrees like this one can only sometimes be solved, depending on the given case. I haven't checked this one though.
How can something like this be solved for example.
Numerically by algorithms like the Newton-Raphson method.
Sometimes I have equations with one variable and I can’t see any way to solve them with the knowledge of math that I currently have. Is it just that a higher level of math is required to solves problems like the one above or am I missing something?
It is a bit of high level mathematics (Galois theory) to see why from degree five on, polynomials cannot be generally solved anymore, and it is not quite trivial to check a certain polynomial.
 
  • Like
Likes Fascheue
It depends what you mean by "solved". If you mean, "write down the answer in terms of elementary functions", then the answer is no, as fresh_42 said. But let's take his example of y=x \exp(x). The solution is x=W_n(y), where Wn is the ProductLog function. This is a tabulated function where you can look up the values, so in this sense it is no different from sin(x). So do you consider the problem "solved"? If by "solved" you mean "find the number(s) for which the equation is satisfied to a sufficient degreee of accuracy", then the solutions for any equation of this type can be solved by numerical methods like Newton-Raphson, if a solution exists.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and Fascheue
Are you allowing complex numbers? Complex numbers allow solutions that are not real. Any polynomial can be factored to factors of order 1 and 2 with real numbers. The order 1 factors give a solution and order 2 factors give 2 conjugate complex solutions. Your example can be manipulated to an equivalent polynomial problem, 5 (1 + x⁷) - x = 0, with x=-1 (and some complex numbers) disallowed.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K