Can this particular method solve these quadratic equations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for solving two quadratic equations, \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), in terms of the variables \(x\) and \(y\). Participants explore various approaches to manipulate these equations, including treating one as a quadratic in \(x\) and substituting into the other, as well as eliminating quadratic terms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests treating \(S_1\) as a quadratic in \(x\) and solving for \(x\) in terms of \(y\), but finds substitution into \(S_2\) unhelpful.
  • Another participant proposes eliminating one of the quadratic terms, either \(x^2\) or \(y^2\), but expresses uncertainty about how to proceed after that.
  • A later reply indicates that multiplying \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) by different constants and subtracting may not yield a solution, questioning the effectiveness of the quoted method.
  • One participant derives a general form for \(x\) and discusses the resulting quartic equation in \(y\), noting that it may not be desirable to solve.
  • Another participant questions why the derived solution for \(x\) does not appear as a fraction, suggesting a misunderstanding of the quadratic formula.
  • Further discussion reveals confusion about the nature of the quartic equation and how to isolate terms for solving.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of the quoted method for solving the equations. There is no consensus on whether the proposed approaches will lead to a solution, and multiple competing views remain regarding the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their approaches, including unresolved mathematical steps and the complexity of the resulting quartic equations. There is also uncertainty about the conditions under which certain methods may or may not work.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quadratic equations, particularly in the context of multiple variables, as well as individuals exploring different methods of solving complex algebraic expressions.

JohnnyGui
Messages
802
Reaction score
51
Given are two equations:
$$S_1 = ax^2+2hxy+by^2 + c=0$$
$$S_2 = a'x^2+2h'xy+b'y^2 + c'=0$$
This source states that there are several methods to solve for ##x## and ##y##. One of them is the following quote:"Treat equation ##S_1## as a quadratic equation in ##x## and solve it for ##x## in terms of ##y##. Then substitute this in equation ##S_2##."

If ##A=a##, ##B=2hy## and ##C=by^2+c##, this means that:
$$x=\frac{-2hy\pm \sqrt{4h^2y^2-4a(by^2+c)}}{2a}$$
However, substituting this in ##S_2## does not make me able to solve for ##x## and ##y##. Expressing ##x## also in terms of the constants of ##S_2## and substituting that in ##S_1## also doesn't help me.

Am I missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why not eliminate one of the quadratic terms - either ##x^2## or ##y^2##?
 
PeroK said:
Why not eliminate one of the quadratic terms - either ##x^2## or ##y^2##?

You mean as in dividing ##S_1## and ##S_2## by either ##x^2## or ##y^2##? I have tried that but I'm not sure how to continue to get ##x## or ##y## on one side.
 
JohnnyGui said:
You mean as in dividing ##S_1## and ##S_2## by either ##x^2## or ##y^2##? I have tried that but I'm not sure how to continue to get ##x## or ##y## on one side.
That won't work. Multiply ##S_1## by ##a'## and ##S_2## by ##a## and subtract one from the other.
 
PeroK said:
That won't work. Multiply S1 by a′ and S2 by a and subtract one from the other.

Thanks, but wouldn't this lead to another method to solve these equations? I was wondering whether the quoted method can actually be used to solve this.
 
JohnnyGui said:
Thanks, but wouldn't this lead to another method to solve these equations? I was wondering whether the quoted method can actually be used to solve this.
It doesn't look very promising to me.
 
Solving S1 for x gives you an expression of the general form ##x=my\pm\sqrt{ny^2+p}## where m,n,p are some constants.. That means ##x^2 = m^2 y^2\pm 2ym\sqrt{ny^2+p}+ny^2+p##. I'll ignore coefficients now, imagine prefactors for every term. Your full second equation then reads:

##0 = y^2 + y + 1 \pm y\sqrt{y^2+1}+y\sqrt{y^2+1}##.
The latter two terms can be combined and isolated:
##y\sqrt{y^2+1} = y^2 + y + 1##
Now square both sides:
##y^2(y^2+1) = (y^2 + y + 1)^2##
That's a quartic equation that is in principle solvable, but it doesn't sound like something you want to do. There might be combinations of coefficients that make this easier to handle.
 
JohnnyGui said:
Given are two equations:
$$S_1 = ax^2+2hxy+by^2 + c=0$$
$$S_2 = a'x^2+2h'xy+b'y^2 + c'=0$$
This source states that there are several methods to solve for ##x## and ##y##. One of them is the following quote:"Treat equation ##S_1## as a quadratic equation in ##x## and solve it for ##x## in terms of ##y##. Then substitute this in equation ##S_2##."

If ##A=a##, ##B=2hy## and ##C=by^2+c##, this means that:
$$x=\frac{-2hy\pm \sqrt{4h^2y^2-4a(by^2+c)}}{2a}$$
However, substituting this in ##S_2## does not make me able to solve for ##x## and ##y##. Expressing ##x## also in terms of the constants of ##S_2## and substituting that in ##S_1## also doesn't help me.

Am I missing something?
You end up in a quartic in y, which is solvable.
 
mfb said:
Solving S1 for x gives you an expression of the general form ##x=my\pm\sqrt{ny^2+p}## where m,n,p are some constants.

Why does this solution for ##x## not have the form of a fraction? It's missing a factor of ##\frac{1}{2a}## as mentioned in my opening post, isn't that how the solution of a quadratic function is defined according to the abc-formula?
 
  • #10
1/(2a) or its square is part of the constants m,n,p, I didn't write everything in terms of a,b,c because that would have made the equations unhandy.
 
  • #11
mathman said:
You end up in a quartic in y, which is solvable.
When substituting the solution for ##x## in the other equation, I get:
$$y^2 \bigg(a'\cdot \frac{(-2h\pm s)^2}{4a^2}+2h'\cdot \frac{-2h\pm s}{2a}+b'\bigg)+c'=0$$
Where ##s=\sqrt{4h^2-4ab+\frac{4ac}{y^2}}##. Not sure how such an equation can be solved.

Also, shouldn't a quartic equation have a variable to the power of ##>2##?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
JohnnyGui said:
When substituting the solution for ##x## in the other equation, I get:
$$y^2 \bigg(a'\cdot \frac{(-2h\pm s)^2}{4a^2}+2h'\cdot \frac{-2h\pm s}{2a}+b'\bigg)+c'=0$$
Where ##s=\sqrt{4h^2-4ab+\frac{4ac}{y^2}}##. Not sure how such an equation can be solved.

Also, shouldn't a quartic equation have a variable to the power of ##>2##?
You need to rearrange terms so that the square root expression is alone on one side of the equation. Square both sides to get a quartic polynomial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K