I Singlet Halperin State Construction

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singlet State
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the construction of the singlet Halperin state in the context of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. The key point of confusion is regarding the identification of the last two factors in the equation as Slater determinants for spin up and spin down states. The participants question how these factors can be recognized as such, given their resemblance to the Vandermonde determinant associated with Laughlin states. Additionally, there is concern about the antisymmetry of these factors and its implications for the overall antisymmetry of the spin states. Clarification on these points is sought to better understand the singlet nature of the Halperin state.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hi all,
I'm reading through David Tong's Fractional Quantum Hall Effect notes right now and am stumped by how he constructs the singlet Halperin state (the last equation in this document: https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qhe/three.pdf, on page 116 as per the document page number at the bottom of each page). Specifically, I do not understand the sentence "It can be seen to be a spin singlet because the last two factors are just Slater determinants for spin up and spin down respectively, which is guaranteed to form a spin singlet." I assume that the "last two factors" are referring to ##\prod_{i<j \ \text{odd}}(z_{i}-z_{j})## and ##\prod_{k<l \ \text{even}}(z_{k}-z_{l})##. My 2 questions are:
i.) How do we see that these are the slater determinants of spin up and spin down? To me, they just look like the vandermonde determinant we see associated with the Laughlin states.
ii.) Aren't these factors antisymmetric? Wouldn't that the be a problem considering the spin states are already antisymmetric?
Thanks!
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...