Singlet Halperin State Construction

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singlet State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the construction of the singlet Halperin state as described in David Tong's notes on the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. The key point is that the last two factors in the equation, specifically ##\prod_{i PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect
  • Familiarity with Slater determinants
  • Knowledge of antisymmetry in quantum states
  • Basic grasp of complex variables and Vandermonde determinants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Halperin state in detail
  • Learn about Slater determinants and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the properties of antisymmetric wave functions
  • Explore the implications of the Vandermonde determinant in quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics students, and researchers studying the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect will benefit from this discussion.

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hi all,
I'm reading through David Tong's Fractional Quantum Hall Effect notes right now and am stumped by how he constructs the singlet Halperin state (the last equation in this document: https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qhe/three.pdf, on page 116 as per the document page number at the bottom of each page). Specifically, I do not understand the sentence "It can be seen to be a spin singlet because the last two factors are just Slater determinants for spin up and spin down respectively, which is guaranteed to form a spin singlet." I assume that the "last two factors" are referring to ##\prod_{i<j \ \text{odd}}(z_{i}-z_{j})## and ##\prod_{k<l \ \text{even}}(z_{k}-z_{l})##. My 2 questions are:
i.) How do we see that these are the slater determinants of spin up and spin down? To me, they just look like the vandermonde determinant we see associated with the Laughlin states.
ii.) Aren't these factors antisymmetric? Wouldn't that the be a problem considering the spin states are already antisymmetric?
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
Replies
24
Views
8K