Slow-rotation weak-field limit of Kerr

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saeide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kerr Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of the slow-rotation weak-field limit of the Kerr metric to describe Earth's spacetime. It is established that while the Kerr metric reduces to the Schwarzschild metric plus a rotation term in this limit, the quadrupole moment of Earth must be considered for accurate modeling. The participants agree that for precise gravitational effects, especially in low Earth orbit, higher moments of Earth's mass distribution are significant. Ultimately, while the weak-field Kerr metric can be used, it is essential to account for the quadrupole moment to enhance accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with Kerr and Schwarzschild metrics
  • Knowledge of multipole expansions in gravitational fields
  • Basic concepts of tensor spherical harmonics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the quadrupole moment in gravitational modeling
  • Learn about linearized General Relativity and its applications
  • Investigate tensor spherical harmonics and their role in gravitational fields
  • Explore the differences between weak-field approximations of Kerr and other metrics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, astrophysicists, and anyone studying gravitational effects in weak-field scenarios, particularly in relation to Earth's mass distribution.

Saeide
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I want to know if slow-rotation weak-field limit of Kerr metric is also acceptable for the Earth situation or not. It has been shown that in this limit, Kerr metric is reduced to Schwarzschild metric plus a cross term that indicates rotation.

So thanks in advance,

Saeide
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if you don't care about the quadrupole moment (oblateness). Kerr constrains the quadrupole moment to be ma2.
 
So it means that we could not consider the quadruple for earth?
Maybe it's better to ask it in this way; While we obtain a linearized GR for a weak-field limit, for a general metric g ab, and we use it for Earth case too, could we deduce that weak-field Kerr, which is just one specific metric, should be also acceptable for earth?
 
"Acceptable" always depends on your required precision. If you care about effects from GR, you probably want to include higher moments of Earth's mass distribution, too. Even in geostationary orbit, they can be relevant, and for low Earth orbit they are much more pronounced (some satellites use their own path to measure the mass distribution of earth).
 
Yes you're right; when I talk about GR, the higher moments would obviously be involved. But the question that I have in my mind is that, while we describe a general metric -without any specific characteristic considered for- with linearized GR, therefore we can conclude that the slow-rotation weak-field limit of Kerr -that is one of the many options for general metric- could also describes the Earth's spacetime. So why do we have limitation in caring about quadrupole moment or not?!
I would be so grateful to know if you have any idea.
 
If it's weak-field you're interested in, forget Kerr, its easy enough to write down the solutions for linearized gravity for any multipole, and superpose them with any coefficients you like. This looks just like the similar problem in electromagnetism, except instead of vector spherical harmonics you use tensor spherical harmonics.
 
Using weak-field Kerr, I want to check the result I've got by linearized GR. That's why I'm interested in Kerr. So I could describe Earth's spacetime by weak-field Kerr, while quadrupole moment could also be obtained by superposition in linearized GR, don't I?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 199 ·
7
Replies
199
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
22K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K