Small 4-stroke, cordless drill gearbox, flywheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter thorpie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drill Flywheel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of using a gearbox designed for electric motors in a small 4-stroke engine application, specifically for a bicycle. Participants explore the implications of power ratings, torque requirements, and the role of flywheel mass in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a gearbox from a 750 watt drill is appropriate for a 750 watt 4-stroke engine, considering the engine operates only 1/4 of the time.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the application, which is revealed to be a bicycle aiming for optimal fuel efficiency over a long distance.
  • Participants discuss the required reduction ratios, noting that a reduction of 26.7:1 is needed, with some suggesting that single-stage planetary gearboxes may only provide up to 12:1.
  • One participant mentions the potential impact of flywheel mass, suggesting it acts as a dampener for power pulses between the crankshaft and gears.
  • Concerns are raised about the durability of drill gearboxes under continuous maximum force, with a suggestion to incorporate a safety factor into the design.
  • There is a note about ensuring accurate measurements of the bicycle wheel diameter, as inaccuracies could significantly affect calculations related to speed and torque.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the suitability of drill gearboxes for the engine application, with no consensus reached on the best approach or specific gearbox recommendations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal gearbox choice and the implications of flywheel mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the assumptions regarding the continuous load ratings of drill gearboxes, nor have they resolved the specific torque and power requirements for the bicycle application.

thorpie
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I would like to know whether a gearbox (reducer) designed for an electric motor is suitable for the same powered 4-stroke engine.
The most common, and therefore inexpensive, gearboxes are on drills, either cordless or wired.
A small 4 stroke engine gives a maximum power of 750 watts. Would a gearbox off a 750 watt drill be suitable? or does the 4 stroke engine only powering 1/4 of the time mean that a gearbox off a 3000 watt electrical tool is needed?
I also assume that the flywheel mass will have some effect on this, could anyone explain what effect the flywheel mass would have?
Literature on cordless drills don't generally show a wattage, for the larger ones a torque of 30 nm is shown. The small 1 hp (750 watt) 4-strokes have a maximum torque of 1 nm. As I am seeking a reduction of 27:1, which would give an output torque of 26 nm, I was wondering whether these gearboxes would be OK
Many Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is your application?
 
Bicycle, but I am aiming at the best assistance possible from 1 litre of fuel over 1,000 km. I need the right terrain, with just 2 gradients, 0.8% downhilll (unpowered, 90% of the time) and 5% uphill (powered, 10% of the time). With the right terrain this provides a constant speed of 21 km/hr, so the engine has increased the speed from 16 km/hr to 21 km/hr and overcome the tyranny of hills.
I am also having trouble identifying a jump start clutch at the back wheel - I can't afford to consistently lose the energy driving a chain and half a clutch away from the bike hub. The average assistance provided is only 40 watts, so a loss of 10 watts is huge, a loss of 20 watts means you may as well not bother with the engine!
 
Just double check the speeds that both are required to run at.
 
Engine at 4500 - 5000 rpm (BSFC of 408 g/litre). 26" external diameter bicycle wheel at 168.7 rpm gives 21 km/hr. Reduction needed 26.7:1.
I can get 2.5:1 from the chain drive, if necessary. So I need somewhere in the range 11:1 to 27:1 from the gearbox. Single stage planetary's go up to 12:1, unsure what they are in drills.
 
thorpie said:
I also assume that the flywheel mass will have some effect on this, could anyone explain what effect the flywheel mass would have?

From a practical standpoint, the flywheel dampens the power pulses. Kind of a "shock absorber" between the crankshaft and gears.
 
Just a thought... a gearbox from a drill is likely not rated for continuous maximum force. You might want to include a healthy safety factor into your working load.
 
thorpie said:
Engine at 4500 - 5000 rpm (BSFC of 408 g/litre). 26" external diameter bicycle wheel at 168.7 rpm gives 21 km/hr. Reduction needed 26.7:1.
I can get 2.5:1 from the chain drive, if necessary. So I need somewhere in the range 11:1 to 27:1 from the gearbox. Single stage planetary's go up to 12:1, unsure what they are in drills.
You may want to measure the bicycle wheel, the measurement on the sidewall doesn't usually reflect the actual diameter of a complete wheel. I just thought I'd point that out because that would greatly effect your calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K