SN1 reactions do not make sense to me

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodium.dioxid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the apparent contradiction in the reactions involving tert-butyl alcohol and tert-butyl chloride. The reactions presented are: (tert-butyl OH) + (HCl) ---> (tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O) and (tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O) ---> (tert-butyl OH) + (HCl). The key conclusion is that these reactions are indeed reversible, which resolves the confusion regarding energy states and the directionality of the reactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of organic chemistry reaction mechanisms
  • Familiarity with the concept of reversible reactions
  • Knowledge of nucleophilic substitution reactions (SN1)
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics in chemical reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanisms of SN1 reactions in detail
  • Research the concept of chemical equilibrium and Le Chatelier's principle
  • Explore the role of solvents in nucleophilic substitution reactions
  • Learn about the energy profiles of reversible reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding organic reaction mechanisms and the principles of chemical reversibility.

sodium.dioxid
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
In one instance, my textbook says:

(tert-butyl OH) + (HCl) ---> (tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O)

In another instance:

(tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O) ---> (tert-butyl OH) + (HCl)

As you can see, there is a contradiction; the idea that reactions occur to achieve lower state of energy is broken since, in one reaction, "B" is lower energy and, in the other reaction, "A" is lower energy.

One of these reactions should disqualify the other one from occurring (unless this is a reversible reaction).
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sodium.dioxid said:
In one instance, my textbook says:

(tert-butyl OH) + (HCl) ---> (tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O)

In another instance:

(tert-butyl Cl) + (H2O) ---> (tert-butyl OH) + (HCl)

As you can see, there is a contradiction; the idea that reactions occur to achieve lower state of energy is broken since, in one reaction, "B" is lower energy and, in the other reaction, "A" is lower energy.

One of these reactions should disqualify the other one from occurring (unless this is a reversible reaction).

Its reversible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K