SN2 Substitution Products: (2R, 3S)-3-methyl-2-methoxypentane

  • Thread starter Thread starter assaftolko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the SN2 reaction involving (2S, 3S)-2-chloro-3-methylpentane and the nucleophile CH3O-. The primary conclusion is that the nucleophile's attack leads to the inversion of configuration at the chiral carbon attached to chlorine, resulting in the product (2R, 3S)-3-methyl-2-methoxypentane. The participants clarify that the reaction produces an ether rather than an alcohol due to the nature of the nucleophile and the mechanism of the reaction, specifically referencing the Williamson ether synthesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SN2 reaction mechanisms
  • Knowledge of chirality and stereochemistry
  • Familiarity with nucleophiles and leaving groups
  • Concept of Williamson ether synthesis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanism of SN2 reactions in detail
  • Learn about chirality and stereochemical inversion
  • Research the Williamson ether synthesis process
  • Explore the properties and behavior of common nucleophiles
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone interested in understanding nucleophilic substitution reactions and ether formation.

assaftolko
Messages
171
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the substitution products of ( 2S, 3S)-2-chloro-3-methylpentane + CH3O- in SN2 reaction.





The Attempt at a Solution



Will the anti-attack of the nucleophile result in the change of S to R for both the chiral carbons or just for the one with Cl connected to it? How can I know this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
assaftolko said:

Homework Statement



Find the substitution products of ( 2S, 3S)-2-chloro-3-methylpentane + CH3O- in SN2 reaction.





The Attempt at a Solution



Will the anti-attack of the nucleophile result in the change of S to R for both the chiral carbons or just for the one with Cl connected to it? How can I know this?

The configuration of the carbon attached with Cl changes. The configuration changes only when the bonds to the chiral carbon break or change.
 
So I'll get (2R,3S)-3-methyl-2-pentanol?
 
assaftolko said:
So I'll get (2R,3S)-3-methyl-2-pentanol?

How do you get an alcohol? Shouldn't that be an ether?
 
How can it be ether? Cl is the leaving group and you get OH that is attached to the Cl's carbon from the other side. Now This carbon is directly attached to O, H, R and R', I don't see how the oxygen can be attached to 2 carbons to form ether...
 
assaftolko said:
How can it be ether? Cl is the leaving group and you get OH that is attached to the Cl's carbon from the other side. Now This carbon is directly attached to O, H, R and R', I don't see how the oxygen can be attached to 2 carbons to form ether...

Williamson ether synthesis.
 
assaftolko said:
How can it be ether? Cl is the leaving group and you get OH that is attached to the Cl's carbon from the other side. Now This carbon is directly attached to O, H, R and R', I don't see how the oxygen can be attached to 2 carbons to form ether...

You said in your first post that the nucleophile was CH3O-, not OH-. This would account for a carbon on one side of the oxygen. As this nucleophile attacks, it kicks away a Cl-, causing inversion of configuration and a new bond to carbon. That makes the oxygen bridge two carbons, forming an ether. I believe the correct answer would be (2R, 3S)-3-methyl-2-methoxypentane.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K