B "Snow" on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is actually stars

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Keith_McClary
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Stars
AI Thread Summary
The ESA's Rosetta mission captured footage of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, showcasing what appeared to be snowy weather on the comet's surface. However, a user pointed out that much of this "snow" is actually background stars, with only some of the visible particles being true icy volatiles. The initial perception of snow was misleading, as the fast-moving streaks identified as snow were misinterpreted without proper image processing. This confusion highlights the importance of careful analysis in interpreting space imagery. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that the apparent snow on the comet is primarily stars, not ice.
Keith_McClary
Messages
752
Reaction score
1,506
TL;DR Summary
"Snow" on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is actually stars.
You may have seen:
10 Space Pictures That Look So Good You Won’t Believe They’re Real
Starts With A Bang
Ethan Siegel

9.) Snowy weather on comets. The ESA’s Rosetta mission witnessed cometary “snow” firsthand.

960x0.jpg


The most spectacular movie from ESA's Rosetta mission shows what the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko looks like, including the volatile ices that sublimate and re-freeze when they're in sunlight or shadow, respectively, causing this snow-like behavior.
ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM

However, landru79 (twitter) has rearranged the frames to show that most of the falling "snow" is actually background stars.
P38FEXeyvW5SK7smWHCEwS-970-80.gif
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The snow that is not stars is snow. Is this unclear?
 
  • Like
Likes stefan r and davenn
Keith_McClary said:
Summary:: "Snow" on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is actually stars.

Snowy weather on comets. The ESA’s Rosetta mission witnessed cometary “snow” firsthand.
Amazing clip!
 
Keith_McClary said:
Summary:: "Snow" on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is actually stars.

This statement is, of course, incorrect

Vanadium 50 said:
The snow that is not stars is snow. Is this unclear?

Exactly, the background points of light are mostly stars. The fast moving foreground streaks are the "snow" icy volatiles
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
davenn said:
This statement is, of course, incorrect
To be quite honest, the stuff in the initial movie that looks like snow is not snow. We don't see the 'real snow' looking like it does - except perhaps in a short film clip when we're driving though it? A very easy mistake. It needed the image processing to resolve the confusion - cleverly done, imo.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top