So why is it important to use mod 2Pi in this formula?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rtharbaugh1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degrees
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of the notation "mod 2Pi" in a formula related to the angles of a triangle in Euclidean geometry. Participants explore the meaning of this notation, its implications for angle measurement in radians versus degrees, and the potential confusion surrounding it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "mod 2Pi" and suggests it might refer to the decimal portion of 2Pi, which they believe does not relate to the angle measurement of 180 degrees.
  • Another participant clarifies that "mod 2Pi" indicates that angles differing by integer multiples of 2Pi are considered equivalent, emphasizing that Pi radians equals 180 degrees.
  • A later reply asserts that the statement "Pi (mod 2Pi) = 180 degrees" is incorrect, proposing instead that the correct interpretation involves the sum of angles in a triangle equating to 180 degrees (mod 360 degrees).
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the concept of "mod" and seek further clarification on its meaning and applications.
  • One participant provides an analogy using days of the week to illustrate the concept of modular arithmetic, suggesting that in geometry, angles like 180 and 540 degrees can be treated as equivalent due to their relationship with full circles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation of "mod 2Pi" and its application to angle measurement. There is no consensus on the correct understanding of the notation or its implications for the formula presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the use of "mod" in the context of angles, indicating a potential lack of clarity in the original text and its notation. The discussion highlights varying interpretations and assumptions about the meaning of "mod" in relation to angle measurements.

rtharbaugh1
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
I am refreshing my maths and came across this formula stated as a fact without explanation in a geometry text. How does this work? I would have thought (mod 2Pi) was the decimal portion of 2Pi but that doesn't multiply out to 180.

Thanks,

R.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rtharbaugh1 said:
I am refreshing my maths and came across this formula stated as a fact without explanation in a geometry text. How does this work? I would have thought (mod 2Pi) was the decimal portion of 2Pi but that doesn't multiply out to 180.

Thanks,

R.

I've never seen such a thing as "pi (mod 2pi)= 180 degrees"! I suspect what is meant is simply that, since a complete circle, measured in radians, is 2pi, while measured in degrees it is 360 degrees, then pi radians is the measure of a half circle which corresponds to 180 degrees.

That's just telling how to convert from one set of units (radians) to another (degrees) and, in my opinion anyway, has nothing to do with "mod". "pi (mod 2pi)= 180 degrees" strikes me as a lot like saying "one foot (mod one yard)= 33 cm."
 
Thank you for the reply. The text is Geometry, A Comprehensive Course by Dan Pedoe, Dover, 1970. Perhaps I have misinterpreted.

On page 3 Pedoe says "We know that in Euclidean geometry, for any triangle ABC, angle BCA + angle CAB + angle ABC = Pi (mod 2Pi)"

If I recall correctly the interior angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees, so I wrote "Pi (mod 2Pi) = 180 degrees." Did I make a mistake?

Anyway, except for using the word "Pi" instead of the Greek symbol, and using the word "angle" where Pedoe uses a symbol like the "less than" symbol "<" but with an arc drawn through it, I have now quoted exactly.

I don't get the "mod" idea. My best understanding from reading around in Wiki and Mathworld is that (mod Pi) would mean the decimal portion of Pi, in other words, Pi minus three. So (mod 2 Pi) should be about .28. Am I anywhere close to the meaning of the mod notation?

Looking on in the chapter, I don't see any further use of the mod notation. Maybe I should just ignore this sentence as some kind of aberration.

Thanks for your comment and any further idea you may have on the idea of "mod".

R
 
Last edited:
The "mod 2Pi" means they are treating angles that differ by an integer multiple of 2Pi as the same, eg. Pi, 3Pi, 5Pi, -Pi, -99Pi all point in the same direction. This isn't saying the real numbers Pi and 3Pi are the same, rather the angles given by Pi and 3Pi radians are the same (recall a full circle is 2Pi radians).

Pi radians=180 degrees. Leaving off the 'radians' part makes it nonsense.
 
We know that in Euclidean geometry, for any triangle ABC, angle BCA + angle CAB + angle ABC = Pi (mod 2Pi)
Yes, that's true. Although I would prefer it said specifically "Pi radians" and "(mod 2Pi radians)".

Pi (mod 2Pi) = 180 degrees
No, that's not at all the same thing. What is the same thing is
"in Euclidean geometry, for any triangle ABC, angle BCA + angle CAB + angle ABC = 180 degrees (mod 360 degrees)"

Both are saying that you can keep increasing the angle without bound- winding around and around the circle, if you like- but normally, we work within "once around the circle", 2pi radians or 360 degrees.
 
Thank you both for the replies. I am still uncertain about the idea of mod, which I have also seen in other places. I would like to feel that the next time I encounter it I will know what it means. Any direction here much appreciated.

Thanks,

Richard
 
Try looking up "Modular arithmetic". This is widely used in number theory (any elementary text will explain it), so you'll be able to find plenty of examples.
 
mod is something you use every day of the week, literally.

Suppose today is still Friday the 17th of February when you read this.

What day is nine days hence? That's a week and two days, so the day of the week is unaffected by adding seven days, so it is sunday. What date is in 3 weeks time? 3 weeks is twenty one days, so that would be the 38'th of February (bear with me), but feb only has 28 days making it ten days into March.

See, you're knocking off multiplies of something useful.In geometry there is no reason to distinguish 180 and 540, in some sense, ie the differ by a full circle of 360 degrees.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K