Solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope

In summary, the conversation is about finding the solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope. There are two methods being discussed - one using the solid angle of a pyramid and the other using an equation involving x squared and L squared. The conversation also mentions finding the solid angle from first principles and considering the size and distance of the detectors. The conversation concludes by mentioning that the corners of the detectors may see slightly different solid angles, but this is usually ignored if L is much greater than the size of the detector.
  • #1
stakhanov
12
1
I am trying to work out the solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope. The telescope is comprised of two aligned square detector panels (of size x squared metres) set at a distance apart of L metres. The way I was initially working it out (by using the solid angle of a pyramid of base x squared and height 0.5L, containing [as I thought] all the possible muon tracks through the telescope) is completely different to that which my friend insists is the right way (a solid angle defined by [(x squared)/(L squared)]).

Any help on how to find the solid angle from first principles and a resultant equation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Remember it's all possible tracks through the distant square to a single point on the near detector.
Assuming the detectors are much further apart than their size then x^2/L^2 sounds right.
 
  • #3
And how would you derive that?
 
  • #4
From the definition of solid angle. And by assuming that sin(a) = a for small angles.
 
  • #5
Ok, so you have all possible tracks going through the first detector to a single point on the second detector (effectively a pyramid) but what about the tracks that hit the second detector outside of the point?
 
  • #6
For any given point on the 2nd detector there is the same area of initial of detector 1 at the same distance and so the same solid angle.
The corners of the detectors do see slightly different solid angles and so the corner-corner angle is larger - this is normally ignored if L is much greater than the size of the detector.
In optical detectors it would correspond to the maximum angle vs the unvignetted angle.
 

1. What is the purpose of a muon telescope?

A muon telescope is a scientific instrument used to detect and measure the number and direction of muons passing through a certain area. These measurements can provide valuable information about cosmic rays and high-energy particles in the atmosphere.

2. How does a muon telescope work?

A muon telescope consists of multiple layers of detectors that are arranged in a specific geometry. When a muon passes through the detectors, it creates a signal that is recorded and analyzed to determine the muon's direction and energy. The solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope refers to the range of angles at which the telescope can detect muons.

3. What factors affect the solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope?

The solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope is influenced by the size and placement of the detectors, as well as the geometry of the telescope. The larger the detectors and the more layers there are, the higher the solid angle acceptance will be. Additionally, the direction and energy of muons can also affect the solid angle acceptance.

4. Why is the solid angle acceptance important in a muon telescope?

The solid angle acceptance is an important factor in a muon telescope because it determines the range of angles at which the telescope can detect muons. A higher solid angle acceptance means that the telescope can detect muons from a wider range of directions, which can provide more comprehensive data on cosmic rays and high-energy particles in the atmosphere.

5. Can the solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope be changed?

Yes, the solid angle acceptance of a muon telescope can be changed by adjusting the size, placement, and geometry of the detectors. However, changing these factors can also affect the sensitivity and accuracy of the telescope, so it is important for scientists to carefully consider the trade-offs when making changes to the solid angle acceptance.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
410
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
496
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
896
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
62
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top