Solution of Euler-Lagrange equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler-lagrange
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the solution of the Euler-Lagrange equation derived from a specific Lagrangian involving a scalar field. Participants explore constant and static solutions, as well as methods for solving the associated differential equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Lagrangian and the resulting Euler-Lagrange equation, seeking solutions for constant and static cases.
  • Another participant confirms that constant solutions can be easily calculated, noting there are three constant solutions: \varphi = a, \varphi = -a, and \varphi = 0.
  • A participant suggests that static solutions imply independence from time, leading to a stationary nonlinear Schrödinger equation, which has established methods for solution.
  • One participant questions the approach to solving the differential equation, considering the possibility of finding a first integral or a physical explanation to aid in the solution.
  • Another participant proposes a soliton-like solution arising from energy conservation, providing a specific form of the equation and discussing integration techniques and potential solutions in terms of elliptic functions.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in expressing the function in terms of the variable and asks for clarification on terms like "phase plane" and "homoclinic or heteroclinic orbits."
  • A later reply suggests that if the constant of integration is zero, the equation becomes separable, and a specific change of variable might simplify the solution. They also reference literature for further reading on phase portraits and advanced concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the existence of constant solutions and the potential for soliton-like solutions, but there are differing opinions on the methods for solving the differential equation and the interpretation of certain terms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to find explicit solutions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for boundary conditions and the complexity of integrating the equations, indicating that assumptions about the constants and initial conditions may affect the solutions.

parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
I have the following Lagrangian:

[tex]\mathcal{L} = 1/2 \partial_{\mu} \varphi \partial^{\mu} \varphi - 1/2 b ( \varphi^{2} - a^{2} )^{2}[/tex], where [tex]a,b \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}[/tex] and [tex]\varphi[/tex] is a real (scalar) field and x are spacetime-coordinates.

I calculated the Euler-Lagrange eq. and get: [tex]\square \varphi + 2 b ( \varphi^{2} - a^{2} ) \varphi = 0[/tex]

My problem is now to find constant solutions and static ones like [tex]\varphi(x) = f(x-x_{0})[/tex] where [tex]x_{0}[/tex] is constant. But I don't know how to solve the differential equation above. Does anyone have an idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Constant solutions are easy to calculate (there are 3 of them), as [itex]\square \varphi[/itex] is zero if [itex]\varphi[/itex] is constant.

Now, for the other question, I'm assuming that for static solution you mean independent of time. If so, [itex]\square \varphi = \nabla^2 f[/itex], which leads to the stationary NLS ecuation with constant potential, and there is plenty of literature on how to solve it.
 
AiRAVATA said:
Constant solutions are easy to calculate (there are 3 of them), as [itex]\square \varphi[/itex] is zero if [itex]\varphi[/itex] is constant.

I recognise the solution if [itex]\varphi[/itex] is constant.

[itex]\varphi = a[/itex] , [itex]\varphi = -a[/itex] and [itex]\varphi = 0[/itex]. :biggrin:
 
Thank you for your replies!

Remark: I think it should be: [tex]\square \varphi = - \nabla^{2} f[/tex]

But isn't there any other (easier) approach to solve this differential equation? I thought of something like finding a first integral or something like that, but I can't. Or maybe there is a (simple) physical explanation which could lead to a solution?
 
Last edited:
There should be a soliton-like solution arising from from energy conservation. For example, let [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/itex], then

[tex]-f'' + 2b(f^2-a^2)f=0.[/tex]

Multiplying by f' and integrating,

[tex]-\frac{f'^2}{2} + b(\frac{f^2}{2}-a^2)f^2 = C,[/tex]

where C is a constant of integration determined by the boundary conditions (i.e. [itex]f,f'\rightarrow 0[/itex] as [itex]x \rightarrow \infty[/itex]). The remainding equation is separable and solvable (in terms of elliptic functions maybe?), and if you study the face plane of the second order equation, you can prove that there is a soliton-like solution (depending of the existence of homoclinic or heteroclinic orbits).

In more variables, you should be able to build a Hamiltonian and see if that approach gives you some additional info.
 
AiRAVATA said:
[tex]-\frac{f'^2}{2} + b(\frac{f^2}{2}-a^2)f^2 = C,[/tex]

Yeap, it is really difficult to expressed f in term of x. Soliton?
wave that maintains its shape while it travels at constant speed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton" without equation!

But what are face plane? homoclinic or heteroclinic orbits ? :cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If C=0 is not that hard to solve, the equation is separable and i think that the change of variable f = sech² x will do the trick. Even if the constant is different than zero, you can solve the integral in terms of elliptic functions (I believe).
Regarding the phase plane or portrait (my native language betrayed me there), you can read all about it in a basic DE book like the one of Braun or Boyce, homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits can be seen in more advanced books, like the second volume of Hubbard's dynamical systems book.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K