Solution?: Quintic Equation from Physical System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quintic equation $X^{5}+ C X - C =0$, which arises from a physical model related to natural ventilation. Participants explore the possibility of finding an explicit analytical solution for the roots in terms of the parameter C, under the constraints that C is non-negative and the roots must be real and within the interval [0, 1].

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Daniel introduces the quintic equation and expresses interest in finding an explicit solution for the roots in terms of C, while noting the physical constraints on X and C.
  • One participant suggests that there is no analytic formula for the roots, particularly due to the unknown value of C, and provides a link to WolframAlpha for numerical solutions.
  • Another participant proposes that while elliptic functions might be used to solve quintic equations, it would likely be complex and not yield significant insights compared to numerical methods.
  • This participant also discusses the behavior of the function for different values of C, indicating that there is always one real positive root between 0 and 1, and suggests using Newton's method for root-finding.
  • A later reply questions the characterization of certain solutions as non-analytic, referencing a specific Mathematica solution involving hypergeometric functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of an analytic solution for the quintic equation. Some believe it is unlikely, while others suggest that certain forms of solutions may exist but are debated in terms of their classification as "analytic."

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of solving quintic equations and the varying interpretations of what constitutes an analytic solution. There are also assumptions regarding the behavior of the roots based on the value of C that remain unverified.

danielFiuza
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
First time in this forum, so greetings to everyone!

I am currently working with some physical models in the field of natural ventilation and I came across the following 5th order polynomial equation (quintic function):

$X^{5}+ C X - C =0$

This is the steady state solution of a physical system of coupled ODEs. And I am interested in finding a explicit relationship for X = f(), (the roots in terms of C), possibly analytically. The values of X (that makes physical sense) needs to be real and between 0 and 1. Additionally, C is a constant (a time scale of my system), which need to be larger or equal than 0 (and to infinity).

I can plot this equation numerically, but I was wondering if I can obtain a explicit/analytical solution of this equation for C>=0 and X[0 1]. I have been reading a little bit about quintic functions, and how some of them can be solved (this one seems to be in a similar way as Quintics in Bring–Jerrard form).

If anyone could give me some insight about this equations or if it is possible an explicit solution for the root with the constrains C>=0 and X[0 1], I would be extremely grateful!

Thanks in advance,

Daniel

EDIT: improved explanation of one line.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it might be possible to solve quintic equations using things like elliptic functions, but I expect it would be a ton of work, would not provide any extra insight, and at the end of the day would probably require at least as much computation as just solving the problem numerically to begin with.

Before jumping to numerics, we can learn a little about the real roots with very little work. Since the ##C=0## case is trivial, I will assume ##C>0##. From Descarte's rule of signs there is only 1 real positive root. If we let ##p(x) = x^5 + C x - C##, then it is clear that ##p(0) = -C## and ##p(1) = 1##, and since ##p## is continuous this tells us the real root is always between 0 and 1. So your constraint always holds.

Newton's method should converge pretty quickly as long as your initial guess is reasonable. For ##C<<1## we expect the root to be small, so ##p(x) \approx x^5 - C## and the root is approximately ##C^{1/5}##. For ##C>>1## we have ##p(x) \approx C x - C## and the root is approximately ##1##. So for an initial guess for Newton's method I would try ##x_0 = C^{1/5}/(1 + C^{1/5})##. I suggest you use Newton's method (or any other root-finding method) to find the root for values of ##C## that span the domain you care about and plot the curve. I suspect it is pretty well behaved.

jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danielFiuza and berkeman
danielFiuza said:
$$X^{5}+ C X - C =0$$

.
Latex needs a double $ sign.
 
fresh_42 said:
I don't think there is an analytic formula, especially with a unknown value of ##c##.
Here are some results from WolframAlpha for it: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x^5+cx-c=0

Why would you not consider the Mathematica solution:

HypergeometricPFQ[{1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5}, {1/2, 3/4, 5/4}, -3125/(256 c)]

to be an "analytic" solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K