Solve Exponential Equations: e^x, e^-x, ln 6 | Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philoctetes3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the exponential equation e^x + e^-x = 6. The correct transformation of the equation is e^(2x) - 6e^x + 1 = 0, which is a quadratic equation in terms of e^x. A substitution of y = e^x simplifies the equation, allowing the use of the quadratic formula for solving. The initial approach contained an error in the manipulation of terms, leading to an incorrect conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and the quadratic formula
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions, specifically natural logarithms
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and substitutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential functions in detail
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations using the quadratic formula
  • Explore the relationship between exponential and logarithmic functions
  • Practice solving various forms of exponential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to improve their skills in solving exponential equations and understanding their applications.

Philoctetes3
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just want to make sure that I have this in the correct order. The book I have is very unclear.

e^x + e^-x = 6
e^x + 1/e^x = 6
e^2x + 1 = 6e^x
e^2x/e^x + 1 = 6
x = ln 6

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've made a mistake. The fourth line doesn't follow from the third. It looks like you tried to divide by e^x (which is actually just undoing what you did in going from line 2 to 3), but you forgot to divide the 1 by e^x.

What you should do is rearrange your third line so that it looks like

e^(2x) - 6e^x + 1 = 0.

Does this look like a familar sort of equation? (If not, let y = e^x. Then does it look familar?)
 
Thanks a lot. I thought something looked off. The thing that worried me is that the answer that I got is quite approximate, and I wanted to make sure that I was doing the process correctly, which I wasn't.

Then after this I would simply do the U form of the quadratic, correct?
 
Yes, the equation is quadratic in form, so a substitution will make it a quadratic, which you can solve using the quadratic formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
747
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K