I Solve for ##n## in ##\frac{1}{(T+\frac{1}{U^{1/n}})^n} = G##

  • Thread starter Thread starter MevsEinstein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The equation ##\frac{1}{(T+s)^n} = G## is analyzed, where ##T## is independent, ##G## is dependent, and both ##s## and ##n## are constants. Substituting ##s = \frac{1}{U^{1/n}}## complicates the equation, making it challenging to isolate ##n## directly. The transformed equation ##(T + s)^n = \frac{1}{G}## allows for logarithmic manipulation to express ##n## in terms of other variables. A numerical approach is suggested due to the complexity introduced by the dependency of ##s## on ##n##. Further approximations could be explored if additional values are known.
MevsEinstein
Messages
124
Reaction score
36
TL;DR
What the title says
I was doing some research on Space where I stumbled on this equation: ##\frac{1}{(T+s)^n} = G##. ##T## is independent and ##G## is dependent. ##s## and ##n## are constants. I found out what ##s## was (##\frac{1}{U^{1/n}}##), and so I substituted it into the equation. Now, I need to find ##n## in terms of other variables that aren't ##n##. How could I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MevsEinstein said:
Summary: What the title says

I was doing some research on Space where I stumbled on this equation: ##\frac{1}{(T+s)^n} = G##. ##T## is independent and ##G## is dependent. ##s## and ##n## are constants. I found out what ##s## was (##\frac{1}{U^{1/n}}##), and so I substituted it into the equation. Now, I need to find ##n## in terms of other variables that aren't ##n##. How could I do this?
Your equation is equivalent to ##(T + s)^n = \frac 1 G##, assuming that ##G \ne 0##. Now take the log (in whatever base) of both sides to isolate n.
 
nln(T+s)=-ln(G) or n=-ln(G)/ln(T+s).
 
mathman said:
nln(T+s)=-ln(G) or n=-ln(G)/ln(T+s).
Pretty much what I said, except that I was going to let the OP do a little of the work.
 
s depends on n too, it is ##s=\frac{1}{U^{\frac{1}{n}}}## which seems to complicate things.
 
That won't have a nice exact solution but a numerical approach should work well.
Maybe there is some useful approximation if we know more about the values.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K