MHB Solve for positive integer solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer Positive
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find the positive integer numbers $a$ and $b$ such that $65(a^3b^3 + a^2 + b^2) = 81(ab^3 + 1)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find the positive integer numbers $a$ and $b$ such that $65(a^3b^3 + a^2 + b^2) = 81(ab^3 + 1)$.

$$65(a^3b^3+a^2+b^2)=81(ab^3+1)$$

$$65a^2(ab^3+1)+65b^2=81(ab^3+1)$$

$$(81-65a^2)(ab^3+1)=65b^2\implies a=1\text{ if there are solutions in the positive integers.}$$

$$16b^3-65b^2+16=0\implies b=4\text{ if }b\text{ is an integer.}$$

$$(a,b)=(1,4)\text{ are the only positive integers that solve the given equation.}$$
 
greg1313 said:
$$65(a^3b^3+a^2+b^2)=81(ab^3+1)$$

$$65a^2(ab^3+1)+65b^2=81(ab^3+1)$$

$$(81-65a^2)(ab^3+1)=65b^2\implies a=1\text{ if there are solutions in the positive integers.}$$

$$16b^3-65b^2+16=0\implies b=4\text{ if }b\text{ is an integer.}$$

$$(a,b)=(1,4)\text{ are the only positive integers that solve the given equation.}$$

Very good job, greg1313! :cool:

My solution:

The given equation can be rewritten as $b^3(a)(65a^2-81)+65b^2+(65a^2-81)=0$ (*).

We have two cases to consider here, first is $65a^2-81>0$, which leads to $a≥2$. Replacing these two important information into (*) we see that we have the relation where it says always positive+always positive+always positive=0, which tells us there is no solution for $a≥2$.

That also means we only have to consider for $0≤a≤1$. Now, solving the above equation for $b$ when $a=1$, we find $b=4$ and there is no solution for the case $a=0$ and we are hence done.
 
anemone said:
Very good job, greg1313! :cool:

My solution:

Now, solving the above equation for $b$ when $a=1$, we find $b=4$ and there is no solution for the case $a=0$ and we are hence done.
because a is positive we need not consider $a = 0$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top