Solve for s: Differential Equation with Initial Condition s(0)=20,000

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation \(\frac{ds}{dt}=600-\frac{2s}{200+t}\) with the initial condition \(s(0)=20,000\). The user initially applies the integrating factor method but incorrectly calculates the integrating factor, leading to an erroneous solution. The correct approach involves revising the calculation of the integrating factor, which is essential for accurately solving the equation. The user is directed to consult their textbook for the correct formula for the integrating factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with integrating factors in differential equations
  • Knowledge of initial value problems
  • Basic calculus, including differentiation and integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of integrating factors in first-order linear differential equations
  • Practice solving initial value problems using differential equations
  • Study the product rule in calculus to avoid common mistakes in differentiation
  • Consult textbooks or online resources for examples of solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with differential equations and initial value problems.

georg gill
Messages
151
Reaction score
6
[tex]\frac{ds}{dt}=600-\frac{2s}{200+t}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ds}{dt}+\frac{2s}{200+t}=600[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ds}{dt}e^{ln(100+t/2)}+\frac{2s}{200+t}e^{ln(100+t/2)}=e^{ln(100+t/2)}600[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}(se^{ln(100+t/2)})=(100+t/2)600[/tex]

[tex]se^{ln(100+t/2)}=\int(100+t/2)600dt[/tex]

[tex]s(100+t/2)=600(100t+t^2/4)+C[/tex]

t=0 s=20 000

[tex]20.000\cdot100=C[/tex]

But this is wrong

I guess i want to know what I did wrong. I used the product rule for derivation backwards. Here is answer sheet

http://bildr.no/view/1051423
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrating factor is wrong. Revise your calculation and look up the formula for it in the book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K