Solve for 'W': Equation Rearranger Online Help

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kieyard
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the Lambert W function, which is essential for solving equations involving the variable 'W'. Users seeking to find the value of 'W' in specific equations often encounter the Lambert W function, which does not provide a conventional solution. Instead, it serves as a representation of solutions to related problems. The forum highlights the inadequacy of online equation rearrangers in providing proper solutions and suggests that resources like WolframAlpha should include direct links to the function's definition for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lambert W function
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with online mathematical tools like WolframAlpha
  • Concept of analytic solutions in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of the Lambert W function
  • Explore how to use WolframAlpha for advanced mathematical functions
  • Learn about analytic versus numerical solutions in mathematics
  • Study examples of equations that utilize the Lambert W function
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced algebra, educators teaching mathematical functions, and anyone interested in solving complex equations involving the Lambert W function.

kieyard
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, Iv been stuck on this for well over an hour now, so I decided to use a equation rearranger online. However it gave me this, I just wanted to know what the value of 'W' is and how they got to that answer. Thanks in advance.
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1469187657.046383.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is not a value, it is the Lambert W function. It is not a proper solution to the problem (there is no proper solution) - the function is defined to have the solution to a similar problem as its value, but there is no analytic way to evaluate it in general.

WolframAlpha should have included a link to the function definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K