Solve Geodesic Problem: Show ku^β = u^α∇αu^β

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a geodesic problem from Wald's General Relativity book, specifically demonstrating that any curve with a tangent satisfying the equation uαα uβ = k uβ can be reparameterized to satisfy the geodesic equation uαα uβ = 0. The solution involves reparameterizing the curve from u = d/dλ to u = d/dt, where t = t(λ). The participant expresses confusion regarding the application of the product rule in expanding the covariant derivative and seeks clarification on the mathematical interpretation of the term ∇α (dt/dλ).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the geodesic equation in General Relativity
  • Knowledge of parameterization of curves
  • Basic calculus, particularly the product rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant derivatives in General Relativity
  • Learn about reparameterization techniques for curves in differential geometry
  • Explore the implications of the geodesic equation in various contexts
  • Review the product rule and its applications in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of General Relativity, physicists working on geodesic equations, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of curved spacetime.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working my way through Wald's GR book and doing this geodesic problem:

Show that any curve whose tangent satisfies [itex]u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = k u^\beta[/itex], where k is a constant, can be reparameterized so that [itex]\tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta = 0[/itex].

Homework Equations



Geodesic equation

The Attempt at a Solution



If we assume that the curve was originally parameterized so that [itex]u = d/d\lambda[/itex] and we reparameterize so that [itex]\tilde{u} = d/dt[/itex] with [itex]t = t(\lambda)[/itex] then it follows immediately that [itex]u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha[/itex].

So then [itex]u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right)[/itex]. Now I know I need to expand this out into two terms, and I was thinking I could use the product rule to do that, but I'm a bit confused about how to do that. It seems I'd get
[itex]u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right) = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta + u^\alpha \tilde{u^\beta} \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}[/itex]
The first term I can relate to my definition [itex]u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha[/itex] to get [itex]\left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\right)^2 \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta[/itex], and I know I'm supposed to relate this and the other term to the other side of the geodesic equation (with the constant k) to get a differential equation to solve for t(lambda). But I'm confused about how to get there from here, mostly from term [itex]\nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda}[/itex]. I don't understand what it means mathematically (isn't dt/dlambda a scalar?), let alone how to do anything with it. Can anyone explain how to take the next step? Or was my "product rule" guess total nonsense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transform all vectors and remember that the covariant derivative becomes a partial derivative for scalars
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K