Solve Hamiltonian Operator Question: What is [\hat{H}, i\hbar]?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutation relation involving the Hamiltonian operator, specifically the expression [\hat{H}, i\hbar]. It clarifies that the term i\hbar typically represents i\hbar\hat{I}, where \hat{I} is the identity operator. The user seeks to prove that [H, xp] = [H, px], with xp defined as px + [x, p]. The operator equation [\hat{x}, \hat{p}] = i\hbar is emphasized as an operator equation, implicitly involving the identity operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator algebra
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum physics
  • Basic concepts of identity operators in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of the identity operator in operator equations
  • Learn about the Hamiltonian operator and its applications in quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with Hamiltonian systems, and anyone studying operator theory in quantum physics.

Jenkz
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm completing a question regarding position and momentum operators, however I'm stuck on one term.

What does [\hat{H}, i\hbar] equal? Or what does it mean?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have i \hbar in an operator equation, it usually means i \hbar \hat{I}, where \hat{I} is the identity operator.
 
Ok maybe putting it into context might help.

The question needs us to prove that [H,xp] =[H,px]

Where xp =px + [x,p]
 
Last edited:
When we write

<br /> [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i \hbar ,<br />

this is an operator equation, so we should really have an operator on the RHS. This operator is the identity operator and it's usually left out because it's clear from the context. To be precise, we'd write

<br /> [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i \hbar \hat{I}.<br />
 
It doesn't really seem to make a difference in my case if I have the identity operator. Anyhow, I've realized what I need to do, so thanks anyways :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K