Solve Hamiltonian Operator Question: What is [\hat{H}, i\hbar]?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Hamiltonian operator and its commutation relations, specifically the expression [\hat{H}, i\hbar]. Participants are exploring the implications of this expression in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly related to position and momentum operators.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the meaning of the commutation relation [\hat{H}, i\hbar] and its implications. There is also a focus on proving a specific relation involving position and momentum operators, [H,xp] = [H,px].

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the role of the identity operator in the context of commutation relations. Some participants are clarifying the notation and its implications, while others express that they have gained insights into their understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the identity operator being implicit in operator equations, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. Participants are navigating through the nuances of operator notation and its significance in quantum mechanics.

Jenkz
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm completing a question regarding position and momentum operators, however I'm stuck on one term.

What does [[tex]\hat{H}[/tex], i[tex]\hbar[/tex]] equal? Or what does it mean?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have [tex]i \hbar[/tex] in an operator equation, it usually means [tex]i \hbar \hat{I}[/tex], where [tex]\hat{I}[/tex] is the identity operator.
 
Ok maybe putting it into context might help.

The question needs us to prove that [H,xp] =[H,px]

Where xp =px + [x,p]
 
Last edited:
When we write

[tex] [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i \hbar ,[/tex]

this is an operator equation, so we should really have an operator on the RHS. This operator is the identity operator and it's usually left out because it's clear from the context. To be precise, we'd write

[tex] [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i \hbar \hat{I}.[/tex]
 
It doesn't really seem to make a difference in my case if I have the identity operator. Anyhow, I've realized what I need to do, so thanks anyways :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K