Solve Inverse Function: x^3 + x + x^(1/2)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
footmath
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
please solve this inverse function :
$ x^{3}+x+x^{1/2}\ $
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please write it more clearly? What you have there isn't even a function of anything.

Perhaps you meant:

[tex] f(x)=x^{3}+x+x^{1/2}<br /> [/tex]

If so, what do you know about inverse functions? What is the general idea of finding an inverse function? Please show work before we help you any more.
 
I want to isolate expression for x
 
Let [itex]y= x^3+ x+ x^{1/2}[/itex]. Make the substitution [itex]z= x^{1/2}[/itex] so the first equation becomes [itex]y= z^6+ z^2+ z[/itex]. Solving the first equation for x is equivalent to solving the equation [itex]z^6+ z^2+ z- y= 0[/itex] for z and then squaring. Since that last equation is a 6th degree polynomial equation, there will be no simple solution in terms of roots.

In, fact, strictly speaking, that function does not have a true inverse because it is not "one to one". Where did you get this problem?
 
For example f(x)=x^2 is not "one to one" but the inverse of is x^1/2 and in partular interval is acceptable.
 
footmath said:
For example f(x)=x^2 is not "one to one" but the inverse of is x^1/2 and in partular interval is acceptable.
I wouldn't put it that way. If f(x)= x^2 is defined on any interval of positive numbers, then its inverse is x^1/2. But if f(x)= x^2 is defined on an interval of negative numbers, its inverse is -x^1/2. Of course, if f(x)= x^2 on an interval that contains both positive and negative numbers, f has no inverse.
 
I don't think there are any concerns about this function being one-to-one. For one thing, [itex]f(x) = x^3 + x +x^{1/2}[/itex] is one-to-one since [itex]f'(x) = 3x^2 + 1 + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}[/itex] is always positive. Also our original f is only defined on [itex][0, \infty)[/itex], so even after the substitution [itex]z = x^{1/2}[/itex], [itex]g(z) = z^6 + z^2 + z[/itex] is still one-to-one on [itex][0, \infty)[/itex].

That said, finding the inverse still looks difficult. Is it possible to do something tricky like integrate the derivative of [itex]f^{-1}[/itex]?
 
That said, finding the inverse still looks difficult. Is it possible to do something tricky like integrate the derivative of f^(-1) ?
I don't thing so. The sextic equation cannot be analytically solved in terms of a finite number of elementary functions. Maybe with generalized hypergeometric functions.
 
How can solve this equation or isolate expression for x or inverse this function :
y=5x^6+3x^2+4
do you believe that this equation can not solve?
 
Of course, y=5x^6+3x^2+4 can be solved because it is a particular case : Let X=x^2 and you can solve the resulting 3th degree equation.
But generally it isn't the case. for exemple y=x^6+x^2+x