Solve Inverse Function: x^3 + x + x^(1/2)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of the function defined by the expression \( f(x) = x^3 + x + x^{1/2} \). Participants explore the challenges associated with isolating \( x \) and the implications of the function's properties, particularly regarding its one-to-one nature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to clarify the function's definition and the general concept of inverse functions. There are attempts to isolate \( x \) through substitutions and polynomial transformations. Questions arise about the function's one-to-one nature and the complexity of solving the resulting equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with various perspectives on the function's properties and the feasibility of finding its inverse. Some participants suggest that the function is one-to-one, while others express concerns about the difficulty of solving the equations involved. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function may not have a true inverse due to its characteristics, and discussions include the implications of defining the function over specific intervals. The complexity of the equations resulting from attempts to isolate \( x \) is also highlighted.

footmath
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
please solve this inverse function :
$ x^{3}+x+x^{1/2}\ $
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please write it more clearly? What you have there isn't even a function of anything.

Perhaps you meant:

[tex] f(x)=x^{3}+x+x^{1/2}<br /> [/tex]

If so, what do you know about inverse functions? What is the general idea of finding an inverse function? Please show work before we help you any more.
 
I want to isolate expression for x
 
Let [itex]y= x^3+ x+ x^{1/2}[/itex]. Make the substitution [itex]z= x^{1/2}[/itex] so the first equation becomes [itex]y= z^6+ z^2+ z[/itex]. Solving the first equation for x is equivalent to solving the equation [itex]z^6+ z^2+ z- y= 0[/itex] for z and then squaring. Since that last equation is a 6th degree polynomial equation, there will be no simple solution in terms of roots.

In, fact, strictly speaking, that function does not have a true inverse because it is not "one to one". Where did you get this problem?
 
For example f(x)=x^2 is not "one to one" but the inverse of is x^1/2 and in partular interval is acceptable.
 
footmath said:
For example f(x)=x^2 is not "one to one" but the inverse of is x^1/2 and in partular interval is acceptable.
I wouldn't put it that way. If f(x)= x^2 is defined on any interval of positive numbers, then its inverse is x^1/2. But if f(x)= x^2 is defined on an interval of negative numbers, its inverse is -x^1/2. Of course, if f(x)= x^2 on an interval that contains both positive and negative numbers, f has no inverse.
 
I don't think there are any concerns about this function being one-to-one. For one thing, [itex]f(x) = x^3 + x +x^{1/2}[/itex] is one-to-one since [itex]f'(x) = 3x^2 + 1 + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}[/itex] is always positive. Also our original f is only defined on [itex][0, \infty)[/itex], so even after the substitution [itex]z = x^{1/2}[/itex], [itex]g(z) = z^6 + z^2 + z[/itex] is still one-to-one on [itex][0, \infty)[/itex].

That said, finding the inverse still looks difficult. Is it possible to do something tricky like integrate the derivative of [itex]f^{-1}[/itex]?
 
That said, finding the inverse still looks difficult. Is it possible to do something tricky like integrate the derivative of f^(-1) ?
I don't thing so. The sextic equation cannot be analytically solved in terms of a finite number of elementary functions. Maybe with generalized hypergeometric functions.
 
How can solve this equation or isolate expression for x or inverse this function :
y=5x^6+3x^2+4
do you believe that this equation can not solve?
 
  • #10
Of course, y=5x^6+3x^2+4 can be solved because it is a particular case : Let X=x^2 and you can solve the resulting 3th degree equation.
But generally it isn't the case. for exemple y=x^6+x^2+x
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K