MHB Solve Investment Problem: Net Profit $1,850 from $13,500 Bonus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kos46
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net
Kos46
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Could someone please help me with the problem I've typed below? It is very similar to another problem on this forum <http://mathhelpboards.com/pre-algebra-algebra-2/investment-problem-8808.html>. I've tried to solve it in a similar way (exclusion and/or substitution) but I keep getting the values \$19 916.67 (fund) and -\$6416.67 (stock) for my answer, which obviously can't be right. I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to solve this the right way.

Here is my problem:
Jerome invested part of his \$13,500 bonus in a fund that paid an 8% profit and
invested the rest in stock that lost 4%. What was his investment in the fund if
his overall net profit was \$1,850?

Thank you for any help at all!
Judith
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let $F$ be the amount invested in the fund and $S$ be the amount invested in the stock. So, right away we know:

$$F+S=13500\tag{1}$$
And then the information regarding the profit may be written as:

$$0.08F-0.04S=1850\tag{2}$$
So, since we're asked to find $F$, solve (1) for $S$, substitute this into (2), and then solve for $F$. :)
 
MarkFL said:
I would let $F$ be the amount invested in the fund and $S$ be the amount invested in the stock. So, right away we know:

$$F+S=13500\tag{1}$$
And then the information regarding the profit may be written as:

$$0.08F-0.04S=1850\tag{2}$$
So, since we're asked to find $F$, solve (1) for $S$, substitute this into (2), and then solve for $F$. :)

Wow! Thank you for replying so quickly!
OK, so, I have
Let x = the amount of money that made an 8% profit
Let y = the amount of money that lost 4%

[1] x + y = 13 500
x = 13 500 - y
y = 13 500 -x

[2] 8/100x - 4/100y = 1850
Multiply both sides by 100 to get rid of fractions
8x - 4y = 185000
8x - 4(13500 - x) = 185000
8x - 54000 + 4x = 185000
12x = 239000
x = 19916.67
Therefore, y = -6416.67 ?

Or by elimination
[1] x + y = 13500
[2] 8x - 4y = 185000

So, multiply [1] by 4 so that y cancels out:

[1] 4x + 4y = 54000
[2] 8x - 4y = 185000
12x = 239000
x = 19916.67

:( If you have time, could you please tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
 
I think the issue here is not with your work, but with the problem instead. If Jerome had invested his entire bonus in the stock, his net profit would be less than \$1850, it would only be \$1080. This is why you're getting answers that don't make sense. :)
 
Thank you so much for confirming my suspicions that the question was flawed! I can't tell you how many times I've tried to solve it. :)
 
If the givens in the problem are correct, then the problem
should state the period of time over which this resulted;
it is certainly not 1 year, as Mark clearly shows.

I fiddled around with this mystery.
Assuming 9000 @ 8%, thus 4500 @ -4%,
then 1850 would be correct IF time = ~3.426 years.

9000(.08)(3.426) = 2466.72
4500(-.04)(3.426)=-616.68
for net of 1850.04

Amen.

Howz things in St-Augustine Mark?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top