Solve Mass & Mean Density of Star w/ Mass Density Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdw_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving mass and mean density of a star using the mass density function p(r) = p0[1 - (r/R)^2]. Participants provide insights on calculating the mass M of the star in terms of p0 and R, emphasizing the need to integrate the density over the volume. The central pressure of the star is derived as Pc = (15/16π) * (GM^2/R^4). Key equations discussed include the mass element dM = 4πρ(r)r^2 dr and the importance of spherical coordinates in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass density functions in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and volume integration
  • Knowledge of gravitational equations, specifically P(r) = -GM(r)ρ(r)/r^2
  • Basic calculus skills for performing integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of mass from density functions in astrophysics
  • Learn about spherical coordinates and their application in volume integrals
  • Explore gravitational equations and their implications in stellar physics
  • Investigate the relationship between mass density and central pressure in stars
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in stellar dynamics and mass density calculations will benefit from this discussion.

jdw_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am wondering if somebody could explain how to answer these questions, it is from "Foundations of astrophysics" ch.15 q15.10

Suppose the mass density of a star as a function of radius is

p(r)=p0[1-(r/R)^2]

where R is the radius of the star

a) Find the mass M of the star in terms of p0 and R
b) Find the mean density of the star in terms of p0
c) Show that the central pressure of the star is:

Pc=15/16pi x GM^2/R^4

I have a good idea on how to do b) and c) but i need help with a)

useful equations :
P(r)= -GM(r)p(r)/r^2

M(r) = 4pi r^2 p(r)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdw,

It looks like you need to integrate the density over the volume in order to get the total mass. The problem is made simpler by the fact that there is symmetry (rho depends only on r, so that the density is constant everywhere on a sphere of radius r). Therefore, the integrals over the angular coordinates will just turn into 4pi, and you'll be integrating over successive spherical shells of surface area 4pi r^2, and thickness dr. To get this result, you need to know what a volume element is in terms of spherical coordinates.
 
cepheid said:
jdw,

It looks like you need to integrate the density over the volume in order to get the total mass. The problem is made simpler by the fact that there is symmetry (rho depends only on r, so that the density is constant everywhere on a sphere of radius r). Therefore, the integrals over the angular coordinates will just turn into 4pi, and you'll be integrating over successive spherical shells of surface area 4pi r^2, and thickness dr. To get this result, you need to know what a volume element is in terms of spherical coordinates.

Spherical coordinates weren't specified so why use them?

Mass is straight forward. First the mass element is...

dM = 4.pi.ρ(r).r2 dr

...sub in ρ(r) = ρo(1-(r/R)2) and expand out the brackets to make it easier to integrate.

From there it's straight forward. I think you might've been confused by what you've quoted as the mass equation:

M(r) = 4pi r^2 p(r) [sic]

...except that's the equation for dM(r) NOT M(r). Was that the problem?

Also 'p(r)' should've been 'ρ(r)' else you'd be thinking "pressure as a function of radius" instead of "density as a function of radius".
 
Last edited:
qraal said:
Spherical coordinates weren't specified so why use them?

I just meant that you implicity already *have* used them if you do the integration over "shells" having surface area 4pi r^2. It's just that the integral over the angular coordinates has already been done. Of course the spherical symmetry means that it reduces to a 1D integral -- I just thought it would be good if the OP could see how that comes about by starting with the full volume integral.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K