Solve Natural Log Problem: 3^x when 2^x=3

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving the relationship between the equations 2^x = 3 and 3^x. They express confusion regarding the use of natural logarithms versus logarithms to base 2 in solving for x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of using different logarithmic bases to solve the equation. Some question the original poster's understanding of logarithmic properties and the implications of taking natural logs.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of logarithms and their applications in solving the problem. Some participants provide insights into the relationship between logarithmic bases, while others clarify misconceptions about square roots and powers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion surrounding the definition of natural logarithms and their relationship to logarithms of other bases. The discussion also touches on common misconceptions regarding square roots and their simplification.

lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Problem: If [tex]2^{x}=3[/tex], what does 3^x equal?

I solved this by taking the [tex]log_{2}[/tex] of both sides. However, the book's solution involves taking the natural log of both sides. Can someone show me why that would work? I don't get what the x power changes to a x term. The natural log is base 10 right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly are you asking? If 23, what... means nothing.

Do you mean:

[itex]2^3 = x[/itex] then what does [itex]3^x[/itex] equal?
 
Kurdt said:
What exactly are you asking? If 23, what... means nothing.

Do you mean:

[itex]2^3 = x[/itex] then what does [itex]3^x[/itex] equal?

My bad... I've edited the problem
 
Also, someone please answer this question. How come: [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^{2}}=2[/tex]??

This is very mind boogling because (-2)^2=4 and the square root of 4 is 2... but, why is it wrong to simplify just by canceling out the power of 2 with the square root? I've always done it that way... =/
 
Last edited:
Ok no probs.

Because exponentials are defined in terms of the exponential function (hence the name) and the natural logarithm is the inverse to the exponential function, it is easy to write a logarithm to the base of any number in terms of natural logs. For example, we define [itex]\log_a (x)=y[/itex] to be the inverse of [itex]x= a^y[/itex]. But from our knowledge of exponentials we can say:

[tex]x=a^y=e^{y\ln (a)} \rightarrow \ln(x)=y\ln(a) \rightarrow y=\frac{\ln (x)}{\ln (a)}[/tex]
 
lLovePhysics said:
Also, someone please answer this question. How come: [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^{2}}=2[/tex]??
The mistake that many people make (especially those in physics, because math majors look out for such mistakes) is that [tex]\sqrt{x^2}=x[/tex]. That is wrong. For example, if [tex]x=(-2)^2[/tex] then [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^2}=2[/tex].

The correct version states that,
[tex]\sqrt{x^2}=|x|[/tex].
 
Kurdt said:
Ok no probs.

Because exponentials are defined in terms of the exponential function (hence the name) and the natural logarithm is the inverse to the exponential function, it is easy to write a logarithm to the base of any number in terms of natural logs. For example, we define [itex]\log_a (x)=y[/itex] to be the inverse of [itex]x= a^y[/itex]. But from our knowledge of exponentials we can say:

[tex]x=a^y=e^{y\ln (a)} \rightarrow \ln(x)=y\ln(a) \rightarrow y=\frac{\ln (x)}{\ln (a)}[/tex]


So [tex]ln[/tex] is basically equal to [tex]log_{e}[/tex] right? What is [tex]e^{log_{e}}[/tex]??
 
Kummer said:
The mistake that many people make (especially those in physics, because math majors look out for such mistakes) is that [tex]\sqrt{x^2}=x[/tex]. That is wrong. For example, if [tex]x=(-2)^2[/tex] then [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^2}=2[/tex].

The correct version states that,
[tex]\sqrt{x^2}=|x|[/tex].

Is there any reason why you can't just take cancel the sqrt. and power of 2? It is different for cube roots and cube powers right?

So the 4th root of (-4)^4 is equal to 4 right?
 
lLovePhysics said:
So [tex]ln[/tex] is basically equal to [tex]log_{e}[/tex] right? What is [tex]e^{log_{e}}[/tex]??

Yes, ln is a shorthand for natural log or loge. The natural logarithm is the inverse function of the exponential function and thus:

[tex]e^{\ln a} = a[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Sorry, I didn't see in your original post that you asked if natural log was log to the base ten. Natural log is log to the base e.
 
  • #11
lLovePhysics said:
Is there any reason why you can't just take cancel the sqrt. and power of 2? It is different for cube roots and cube powers right?

So the 4th root of (-4)^4 is equal to 4 right?

What Kummer said was correct about the absolute value of two. You can't just cancel it out, you may cancel it out though if it is (square root of x)^2 as long as the radical symbol is inside the parentheses then you may cancel out.
 
  • #12
Getting back to the first question:
If 2x= 3, then log(2x)= x log(2)= log(3) so
[tex]x= \frac{log(3)}{log(2)}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Now, 3<sup>x</sup>= 3<sup>log(3)/log(2)</sup>.<br /> <br /> That isn't going to be any simple number (it's about 5.7).[/tex]
 
  • #13
lLovePhysics said:
Is there any reason why you can't just take cancel the sqrt. and power of 2? It is different for cube roots and cube powers right?

So the 4th root of (-4)^4 is equal to 4 right?

Yup, exactly. Well, since y = x3 is a 1-to-1 function, i.e, for every [tex]x_0 \neq x_1[/tex], we'll obtain: [tex]y_0 = x_0 ^ 3 \neq y_1 = x_1 ^ 3[/tex], so given one y, we can find only one x such that y = x3.

But y = 2 is a different thing. 2 numbers a, and -a, are different (for a <> 0), but when squared, they'll become: (a2) = a2, and (-a)2 = (-1)2 a2 = a2, so, we have: [tex](a) ^ 2 = (-a) ^ 2 = a ^ 2[/tex]. So, for any y (not 0), there'll be 2 different x's, one positive, one negative, such that, when squared, they'll give y.

Say, y = 4, then 2 x's are 2, and -2.

Square root function will only return the non-negative value.

Say, we have: y = 4, so sqrt(y) = 2; k = 16 ~~> sqrt(k) = 4.

So, in general, we have: [tex]\sqrt{a ^ 2} = |a|[/tex]

To take the negative value, we can assign the minus sign in front of it, like this:

[tex]t = 36 \Rightarrow - \sqrt{t} = -6[/tex]

-------------------------

And it's the same for even-th root, like: [tex]\sqrt[4]{x ^ 4} = |x| , \ \sqrt[6]{x ^ 6} = |x|, ...[/tex], blah, blah, blah, so on. :)

Hope that's clear. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K