MHB Solve Odd Math Puzzle: a^2+b^2=k(ab+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathpleb
  • Start date Start date
mathpleb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This isn't for me, it's for a friend. I'm still teaching myself stuff before Trigonometry.

Anyways, he has a puzzle. a^2+b^2=k(ab+1).

A and B are given as positive integers.

Q: "Prove that K can only take on the value of fractions or squares."
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Isn't this clear, since $k = \frac{a^2 + b^2}{ab + 1}$ is always a fraction when $a$ and $b$ are positive integers? Or perhaps I am overlooking something?
Also, could it be you posted this accidentally in the "differential equations" section?

EDIT: I see it was already moved to the right section, thank you (Smile)
 
I suspect this is supposed to be problem #6 at IMO 1988, in which case it should read:

Let $\displaystyle k={{a^2+b^2}\over{1+ab}}.
$ Show that if $k$ is an integer then $k$ is a perfect square.

The proof (along with its history) is given in the Wikipedia article on Vieta jumping.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top