Solve Pendulum Problem: Max Speed of Child in Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter gangrene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The pendulum problem involves calculating the maximum speed of a child on a swing, given a mass of 15.22 kg and a swing length of 2.97 meters, released from an angle of 42.9 degrees. The correct maximum speed is 1.26 m/s, achieved by applying the conservation of energy principle. The height difference used in the calculations is derived from the formula L(1 - cos(max angle)), where L is the length of the pendulum. Misinterpretations of height calculations led to incorrect answers in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine
  • Familiarity with pendulum motion dynamics
  • Ability to perform basic algebraic manipulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential and kinetic energy equations in pendulum motion
  • Learn how to apply trigonometric functions to physical problems
  • Research the effects of mass and angle on pendulum speed
  • Explore advanced topics in oscillatory motion and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding pendulum dynamics and energy conservation principles.

gangrene
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
this question has been bugging me for the last few days and my incompetent professor refuses to help me through email.


-----------------------------

Question 10 (1 point)

A child of mass 15.22 kG sitting on a swing whole length is 2.97
meters is pulled up an angle 42.9 degrees and released. The maximum
speed of the child during the subsequent motion (in Meters/sec) is?

Student response 3.98
Correct answer 1.26E0 (1.26 * 10^0 )


Score 0 / 1

-----------------------------



I tried solving this problem by energy conservation and setting max kinetic energy = max potential energy. I figure when the child swings back to equilibrium angle 0, the speed would be greatest with max kinetic energy and with 0 potential energy. The height I used for max potential energy was 2.97-2.97cos42.9 (L-Lcos42.9).

am I doing something wrong?

thx in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks OK to me. (The "correct" answer looks wrong.)
 
Hi,

I actually remember coming across this problem a while back,
if I remember correctly, Itired to solve this but got stuck in trying to apply conservation of energy to the system because I was not able to figure out the [change in height] from initial position to the bottom where velocity would have been at its max.

If anyone was able to figure this out, it would be nice if they could explain how.

Thanks,

-Tony Zalles.
 
ok there's two height values to account for. the first value is when the pendulum is in equilibrium making an angle 0 degrees while the other value is when the pendulum is at it's max angle.

for the height when the pendulum is in equilibrium, the height is simply the length of the pendulum L since it's perfectly vertical and there is no x compenent.

for the height when the pendulum is at its max angle, the height is Lcos(max angle). when the pendulum is at its max angle, its vertical height is its y component.

the difference in height between the two is L-Lcos(max angle).
or simplified to L(1-cos(maxangle))

hope that helps
 
Tony Zalles said:
Hi,

I actually remember coming across this problem a while back,
if I remember correctly, Itired to solve this but got stuck in trying to apply conservation of energy to the system because I was not able to figure out the [change in height] from initial position to the bottom where velocity would have been at its max.

If anyone was able to figure this out, it would be nice if they could explain how.

Thanks,

-Tony Zalles.

gangrene said all there is to say but here it is in image.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 414

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
854
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K