Solve Polarized Sphere Field: Find Charges & Calculate Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Sphere
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a uniformly polarized sphere with a radial polarization defined as P = k/r². The participants derive the bound surface charge density σ = k/r² and confirm that the volume charge density ρ = 0. They calculate the electric field outside the sphere as E = kR²/(ε₀r²). However, there is confusion regarding the implications of polarization and the resulting electric field, particularly questioning how a polarization can create an external field and the role of the delta function in the mathematical treatment of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with polarization concepts in dielectric materials
  • Knowledge of divergence operator and its physical implications
  • Proficiency in applying Gauss's Law in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of bound charges in polarized materials
  • Learn about the delta function and its role in charge distributions
  • Explore the derivation of electric fields from polarization using Maxwell's equations
  • Investigate the concept of uniform versus non-uniform polarization in dielectric spheres
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, dielectric materials, and mathematical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A sphere with radius R carries a uniform polarization in the radial direction P = k/r2
Find the bound charges and calculate the field they produce outside the sphere.

Homework Equations


ρ = -∇[itex]\bullet[/itex]P
σ = P[itex]\bullet[/itex][itex]\hat{r}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


We find σ = k/r2
ρ = 0
So the field they produce is E = kR2/(ε0r2)

But this can't be true! How can a polarization create a field outside the sphere? Something is definitely wrong. Because we also have:
D = ε0E
And using a Gaussian surface you find:
E=0

And I am confident in the last result. There is something disappearing in the above - where have all the charges of opposite sign gone? I believe it has to do with the mathematics behind ∇[itex]\bullet[/itex]k/r2 = 0. For that the pesky delta function is involved in that I believe. If ρ=0 we also find no field inside the sphere. Can that really be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me check a couple of things: The polarisation is k/r2 in the radial direction, so how is it uniform polarisation? Also, I agree with your answer E = kR2/(ε0r2) due to the bound charges. Why do you think it is wrong?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K