Solve Pool/Snooker Dispute: Smaller or Larger Tip?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adr147
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of tip size on generating spin in snooker and pool. Participants explore the theoretical and practical implications of using smaller versus larger tips, considering factors such as contact area, friction, and personal experience in gameplay.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a smaller tip may generate more spin due to increased contact time with the cue ball, while others argue that a larger tip provides a greater contact area, potentially increasing friction.
  • One participant emphasizes that the material of the tip is crucial, noting that softer tips can grip better, which may aid in generating spin.
  • Another participant points out that friction force depends on the roughness of the tip rather than its area, suggesting that theoretically, tip size should not matter.
  • Some participants express that they find it easier to aim with a smaller tip, which may psychologically influence their performance.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between tip thickness and the weight class of the cue, with some suggesting that personal comfort and aiming preferences play a significant role.
  • A participant raises the idea that the smaller tip may contact the cue ball for a longer duration, reducing a 'slapping' effect and potentially aiding in spin generation.
  • Multiple participants share personal experiences, with some preferring larger tips for better control and others favoring smaller tips for precision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a smaller or larger tip generates more spin, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various factors that could influence the outcome, such as tip hardness, material, and personal playing style, but do not resolve these complexities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to players of snooker and pool, cue sports enthusiasts, and those curious about the physics of spin and friction in sports equipment.

  • #61
prasannapakkiam said:
Okay. Here is my say:

In cricket, spin is achieved when the ball is in contact with the ground for a maximum amount of time - thus moist pitches and 'flighting the ball' helps. So I would think a larger tip would stay in contact with the ball for a longer period of time. This creates maximum time of contact for a good spin to occur...


a larger tip is in contact for less time - a bigger tip has more of a slapping effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Then it is the smaller tip (I do not play Snooker much), anyway it is all about the time spent in contact.
 
  • #63
prasannapakkiam said:
Then it is the smaller tip (I do not play Snooker much), anyway it is all about the time spent in contact.

maybe, although many people on here much brighter than me say it makes no difference!
 
  • #64
Read the book on "Physics of Ball Games". It states in Snooker, such collisions are almost elastic, thus the difference in time in contact is negligible. The only thing REALLY affecting spin, is the position upon which the ball was hit upon.
 
  • #65
prasannapakkiam said:
Read the book on "Physics of Ball Games". It states in Snooker, such collisions are almost elastic, thus the difference in time in contact is negligible. The only thing REALLY affecting spin, is the position upon which the ball was hit upon.

this is the point of the question! - i was hoping that someone on here would be able to give me a solid answer and all i have now are more questions!
 
  • #66
Look at it this way:
You can initially consider the tip and the ball to be spheres of different radii. If neither deformed, there would be a single point of contact as with other spheres. The larger tip has a larger radius than the small tip. Since it does flatten under impact, that radius results in more deformed surface area in contact.
Anyhow, as I said before, personal experience indicates that the larger tip is superior for juicing the ball.
 
  • #67
now you see months later and still no-body has proved to me in scientific terms which is better, where else can i find this information if not on a physics forum!:smile: (hint - i know as a player the answer is smaller, what i don't know is why, and by the way some of the top players in the world are waiting on snooker and pool forums for an answer!)
 
Last edited:
  • #68
One other factor is that the tip mass will effect a deflection of the cue ball when you strike off center (i.e. apply side spin). That is to say instead of the cue ball going exactly in the direction of your stroke, it will bounce slightly to the side. The lighter the tip the less this will occur. Smaller usually means lighter in this case. For all I know that is the main issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
906
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K