MHB Solve Prove by Induction: 3^2n+1 + 2^n-1 Divisible by 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter simcan18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving by induction that the expression 3^(2n+1) + 2^(n-1) is divisible by 7 for all integers n greater than or equal to 1. The base case has been established, and the inductive step involves showing that if the statement holds for n=k, it must also hold for n=k+1. The transformation of the expression during the inductive step is crucial, with participants noting the importance of rearranging the expression to highlight divisibility by 7. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in each step of the proof to ensure correctness. The problem-solving approach is centered on manipulating the expression to reveal its divisibility properties.
simcan18
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can someone with understanding of proof by induction help with this problem?

Prove by induction that 3 raised to 2n+1 + 2 raised to n-1 is divisible by 7 for all numbers greater than/or equal to 1. How do you do the inductive step?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have done the base case and some of the inductive..which I'm not sure I'm going in the right direction.
Inductive, So does it hold true for n=k+1
3 raised 2(k+1)+1 +2 raised(k+1)-1 = 3 raised 2k+2+1 +2 raised (k+1)-1
= 3 raised 2k+1 x 3 raised2 + 2 raised k x 2 raised 0
=9 x 3 raised 2k+1 + 1 x 2 raised k
= 27 x 3 raised 2k +1x2 raised k

Problem isn't posting correctly
 
$3^{2(k+1)+1}+2^{(k+1)-1}$​

$=\quad3^{2k+3}+2^k$

$=\quad9\cdot3^{2k+1}+2\cdot2^{k-1}$

$=\quad7\cdot3^{2k+1}+2\cdot\left(3^{2k+1}+2^{k-1}\right).$

It should be straightforward to proceed from here.

When doing problems of this kind, look at the number you want your expression to be divisible by (in this case $7$) and try and rearrange your expression to involve it.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
926
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K