MHB Solve Set Problems on Books (Sweating): Get Ideas Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Set
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
(Sweating) Any Ideas on how to begin?

An incomplete Venn diagram containing the information about 100 types of books displayed at bookstall is shown in the figure.

View attachment 5975

(i) There were 70 translation book types and also there were 40 scientific translation book types that were not in English. How many English scientific translation book types were there?

(ii) If there were 20 English book types, how many of them were not translations?

(iii) Show that the number of book types which were neither in English nor translations were $\frac{7}{25}$ of the total number of types displayed in the bookstall.

(iv) Taking into account the selling ratios of book types he had experienced during the previous sales the bookstall owner had brought the book types to the stall in the same ratio. Find the probability that a randomly chosen student who visited the bookstall had bought an English translation book type.

Many Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • New Document 43-Page .jpg
    New Document 43-Page .jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's begin with scientific translations. From the diagram, we see that there are two groups within it, English and non-English (of which there are 40).

We know there are 70 translations types total, so we may state:

70 = #English translations(non-scientific) + #English translations(scientific) + #non-English translations(non-scientific) + #non-English translations(scientific)

Fill in what we know so far:

70 = 7 + #English translations(scientific) + 12 + 40

70 = #English translations(scientific) + 59

11 = #English translations(scientific)

Okay, now look at the English types. There are 3 groups, and you now know two of them...can you get the third, which will answer part ii)?
 
MarkFL said:
Let's begin with scientific translations. From the diagram, we see that there are two groups within it, English and non-English (of which there are 40).

We know there are 70 translations types total, so we may state:

70 = #English translations(non-scientific) + #English translations(scientific) + #non-English translations(non-scientific) + #non-English translations(scientific)

Fill in what we know so far:

70 = 7 + #English translations(scientific) + 12 + 40

70 = #English translations(scientific) + 59

11 = #English translations(scientific)

Okay, now look at the English types. There are 3 groups, and you now know two of them...can you get the third, which will answer part ii)?

Thank you very much (Yes)(Smile)(Happy)

mathlearn said:
(ii) If there were 20 English book types, how many of them were not translations?

Many Thanks :)

20=(#english translations) +(#english scientific translations)+(#english)
20= 7+11+(#english)
20=18+(#english)
2=(#english)

So 2 of the english books were not translations;

Many Thanks MarkFL (Smile)
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • mathlearnvenn.jpg
    mathlearnvenn.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 107
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top