Solve Unresolved Past Paper Question: Physics 11/11

  • Thread starter Thread starter FunkyDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a past paper question related to the power factor of a parallel LCR circuit. The original poster is attempting to find the capacitance value that would make the imaginary part of the complex impedance vanish, given specific values for inductance and resistance at a mains frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their approach to calculating the impedance and equating the imaginary part to zero. They express uncertainty regarding the sign used for the capacitive reactance in their calculations and question whether their understanding of phasors is correct.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the use of LaTeX formatting and discussing the correct signs for the capacitive reactance in the context of phasors. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these signs on the calculations presented by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of an answer key and expresses concern about potential mistakes in their calculations. They are also navigating the use of LaTeX for the first time, which adds to the complexity of their post.

FunkyDwarf
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Past paper question - please help, still unresolved! (11/11)

Hey guys

Im studyin for my physics end of year exam (only first year so its prob easy peasy for you guys) but unfortunately i have no answer key as yet so i don't know if what I am doing is right. I get a plausable answer but i just wanted to be sure incase i never get the answers from lecturers (im badgering em heaps don't worry)

Ok this might take a while to set out in latex thing but ill give it a go

The question is about power factor of a parallel LCR ciruit but in a nutshell i need to find C such that the imaginary part of the complex impedance vanishes (ie angle is zero)

Were given that
[tex]L= 5 \\<br /> R = 4[/tex] and were doing this at mains freq of [tex]\omega = 50Hz[/tex]

Unfortunately i can't upload the image right now but all you need to know is that this parallel circuit has 2 arms, one just has the capacitor the other the resistor and inductor in series.

So, working out impedances:
[tex]Z = \frac{1}{(R+\omega Li)} - \omega Ci[/tex] Now I've always used minus i for the capacitor part because of the angle difference in the phasor, i assume i do that here.

Next i try to get the imaginary parts off the bottom.
[tex]\frac{1}{(R+ \omega Li)} * \frac{(R- \omega Li)}{(R-\omega Li)} = \frac{R- \omega Li}{((R^2)+(\omega L)^2)}[/tex]

Then putting it back in and making it one big happy fraction
[tex]\frac{(R-\omega Li - (\omega Ci)(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}{(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}<br /> <br /> = \frac{(R-\omega Li - \omega CR^2 i - \omega ^3 L^2Ci)}{(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}[/tex]
Now just taking the imaginary bit and equating to zero (getting rid of denominator for obvious reasons)
[tex] (-\omega L-\omega CR^2-(\omega )^3 L^2C = 0[/tex] Then just shoving in those numbers and ignoring the minus sign (which has me rather worried) i get C = 7.9 x 10^-5 farad.

Hope this makes sense and I am right!

Cheers for help (please don't flame my stupidity if i made a stupid mistake, first time with latex too)
-G
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The [tex]tag closes with [ / tex] (without the spaces of course)<br /> <br /> Daniel.[/tex]
 
yah just fixing that now cheers :D tryin to get omega to work too :S

hmm some of the changes arent saving. anyway
 
Last edited:
It's \omega and the same for the other symbols and functions.

Daniel.
 
yah its not saving the changesEDIT... ah there we go
 
Ok i found out what's wrong, its the fact that i used -iwC instead of +iwC, which screws it all up. However i always thought that due to phasors and phase differences etc your supposed to use the minus. Anyone?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K