MHB Solve Vector Space Question: Get the Solution Now

LearnerJr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6276

How do you solve this question I just need a solution
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    18.8 KB · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello LearnerJr and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
greg1313 said:
Hello LearnerJr and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?

Yes of course. For 2a I know a bit of indirect proof and assume the result
Is not true. But not sure still how to perceive this question in the long run.
2b I know if it's a basis it's vectors have to be linearly independent, they span V.but I still can't solve it.
 
Consider the equation $af(v_1)+ bf(v_2)+ cf(v_3)= 0$. In order to show that $f(v_1)$, $f(v_2)$, and $f(v_3)$ are independent we must show that a= b= c= 0.

Since f is a linear transformation, $af(v_1)+ bf(v_2)+ cf(v_3)= f(av_1+ bv_2+ cv_3)= 0$. Since the kernel of f is only the 0 vector, we must have $av_1+ bv_2+ cv_3= 0$. But we were given that $v_1$, $v_2$, and $v_3$ are independent so a= b= c= 0 as we wished.
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K