(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Solving 2D Poisson problem with a single series!!

Conventional solution of [tex]\nambla^2u(x,y)=f(x,y)[/tex] involve solution [tex]u(x,y)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}E_{mn} sin(\frac{m\pi}{a}x) sin(\frac{n\pi}{a}y)[/tex]

This is a two series solution which is tedious to solve.

The book PDE by Asmar suggested a method of solving Poisson problem with one series by lumping function of y into the coefficient [tex]E_{mn}[/tex] by using:

[tex]u(x,y)= \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} E_m(y)sin(\frac{m\pi}{a}x)[/tex] .AND

The book gave the final equation of:

[tex]E_m(y) = (\frac{-1}{\frac{m\pi}{a} sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}b)})[ h_1(y)\int_0^y h_2(s)b_m(s)ds \;\;+\;\; h_2(y)\int_y^b h_1(s)b_m(s)ds][/tex] (1)

where the associate homogeneous solution is:

[tex]h_1(y) = sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}(b-y)) \;\;and\;\; h_2(y) = sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}y) [/tex]

This book claimed this is by using variation of parameters using h1 and h2 as y1 and y2 obtain from solving the associate homogeneous equation.

I use the standard variation of parameter and cannot get the same answer. Can someone point me to a web site to verify the book? I hate to say the book is wrong but I did triple verified and fail. I have not manage to find anything on this from 4 other text book nor on the web to even talk about single series solution.

Is it really important to use single series rather than two series because I have not problem doing in the convensional way using two series, it is very easy to understand. It is the book trying to be simple and jump steps that I don't agree with their formula all all.

I think [tex]b_m(s)[/tex] in (1) should not be integrated like this in the definite integral. Because it really a function of y, not a function of (b-y).

I think the solution using variation of parameters should be:

[tex]E_m(y) = (\frac{-1}{\frac{m\pi}{a} sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}b)})[ h_1(y)\int h_2(y)b_m(y)ds \;\;+\;\; h_2(y)\int h_1(y)b_m(y)dy][/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow E_m(y) = (\frac{-1}{\frac{m\pi}{a} sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}b)})[ sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}(b-y)) \int sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}y) b_m(y)dy \;\;+\;\;sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}y) \int sinh(\frac{m\pi}{a}(b-y)) b_m(y)dy][/tex]

Please tell me whether I am correct, no more of the dummy variable "s".

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Solving 2D Poisson problem with a single series

Loading...

Similar Threads for Solving Poisson problem | Date |
---|---|

I Solving Poisson's Equation Using Finite Difference | Feb 13, 2017 |

I Solving Poissons Equation Using Finite Difference | Feb 13, 2017 |

Have a software that solves Helmholtz equation, can I use it for Poisson? | Oct 22, 2014 |

Solving Poisson Equation by using FDM | Jun 8, 2012 |

Solving Poissons equation with a delta function in RHS using separation of variables. | Sep 14, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**