MHB Solving a Challenging Number Sequence Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fallen Angel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Fallen Angel
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm new in the forum and I bring a challenge

Here is the problem:

For a positive integer $$x$$, denote its n-th decimal digit as $$d_{n}(x)$$, with $$d_{n}(x)\in \{0,1,\ldots ,9\}$$ so $$x=\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{+\infty}d_{i}(x)10^{i-1}$$.

Let $$(a_{n})_{n\in \Bbb{N}}$$ be a squence such that there are only finitely many zeros in the sequence $$(d_{n}(a_{n}))_{n\in \Bbb{N}}$$.

Prove that there are infinitely many positive integers that do not occur in the sequence $$(a_{n})_{n\in\Bbb{N}}$$.Hope you enjoy it! :p
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well here you got the solution.

Let $$n_{0}=max\{n\in \mathbb{N} \ : \ (d_{n}(a_{n}))=0$$
Until this point there are just $$n_{0}$$ positive integers that occur in the sequence $$(a_{n})$$.
Then we got that for all $$n > n_{0},\ a_{n}\geq 10^{n-1}$$
Hence , there are $$10^{n-1}-n$$ positive integers that can not occur in the sequence $$(a_{n})$$ till the n-th position.
Taking the limit we got the result.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top