Determine Convergence/Divergence of Sequence: f(x)=ln(x)^2/x

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by \( a_n = \frac{\ln(n)^2}{n} \) converges to 0 as \( n \) approaches infinity. This conclusion is reached by applying L'Hôpital's Rule, which shows that \( \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{\ln(x)^2}{x} = 0 \). The discussion emphasizes the importance of notation clarity, particularly in the interpretation of logarithmic expressions, and the necessity of providing detailed explanations when applying mathematical rules. The sequence is confirmed to be decreasing for \( n \geq 3 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's Rule and its application
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus concepts, including differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in various contexts
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in depth
  • Learn about monotonic sequences and their convergence criteria
  • Investigate alternative methods for proving convergence without derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the convergence of sequences and the application of L'Hôpital's Rule.

  • #31
I'm simply amazed at the apparent impossibility of isolating ##n## in
$$
\big| \frac{ 2 ln(n)}{n}\big| \lt \varepsilon
$$
and the impossibility of Squeezing ##\frac{2 ln (n)}{n}## properly. There is no function that I can think of which does the job.

I do not know if the following proof is rigorous, but I present it still:
$$
\begin{flalign*}
a_n = \frac{ 2 ln(n) }{n} \\
A_n = e^{a_n} = (e^{ln(n)})^{2/n} = (n^{1/n})^2\\
\lim A_n = \lim n^{1/n} \cdot \lim n^{1/n} = 1\\
\lim e^{a_n} = 1 \\
\textrm{As}~e^x~\textrm{is a continuous function, we have} \\
\lim a_n = a_0 \implies \lim e^{a_n} = e^{a_0} = 1 \implies a_0 = 0 \\
\textrm{Thus,} ~~\lim a_n = 0\\
\end{flalign*}
$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vela said:
This argument doesn't really work. Suppose instead we assume ##n=1## instead of ##n=3##. The rest of the argument would remain unchanged, but it would be wrong to conclude the sequence is decreasing after ##n=1##.

Your assumption is that the sequence isn't decreasing for all ##n > 3##. The contradiction tells you the sequence decreases for some ##n > 3##. That's not the same as saying the sequence decreases for all ##n > 3##.
@Hall you did not respond to this...i would be interested on your view on this...
 
  • #33
chwala said:
@fresh_42 ...you had mentioned in my other post that I cannot use L' Hopital's rule...kindly clarify...cheers.
The rule is applicable for differentiable functions. You can conclude with L'Hopital that
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \frac{\ln x^2}{x} = 0.<br />
In the discrete case this is also true due to continuity.

You should be careful, though. You claimed something like
<br /> \lim _{x\to a} f(x) = L \Rightarrow (a_n \to a \Rightarrow \lim _n f(a_n) = L).<br />
This is true for continuous functions. To be more precise, the function of interest has to be continuous around the point of convergence. In the event ##x\to\infty##, it should be that ##f## is continuous from some point onward.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
nuuskur said:
The rule is applicable for differentiable functions. You can conclude with L'Hopital that
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \frac{\ln x^2}{x} = 0.<br />
In the discrete case this is also true due to continuity.

You should be careful, though. You claimed something like
<br /> \lim _{x\to a} f(x) = L \Rightarrow (a_n \to a \Rightarrow \lim _n f(a_n) = L).<br />
This is true for continuous functions. To be more precise, the function of interest has to be continuous around the point of convergence. In the event ##x\to\infty##, it should be that ##f## is continuous from some point onward.
You state that the rule applies to differentiable functions? This function is not continous at ##x=0##, do we still consider it as a differentiable function?

In my understanding, if a function is not continous then it is not differentiable.
 
  • #35
chwala said:
You state that the rule applies to differentiable functions? This function is not continous at ##x=0##, do we still consider it as a differentiable function?

In my understanding, if a function is not continous then it is not differentiable.

The limit is being taken as x \to \infty; the behaviour of the function at x = 0 is of no consequence.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala and nuuskur

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
961
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K