Solving a hard DE: R'(t)=k*4*pi*R(t)^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathman2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation R'(t) = k*4*pi*R(t)^2, with initial conditions R(0) = 5 and R'(0) = -0.001. Participants suggest that the solution can be verified by differentiating the solution function once, as it is a first-order differential equation. The equation can be transformed into the separable form dR/R^2 = Constant*dt, allowing for manual solution. The conversation also highlights the importance of using the correct edition of the reference material, specifically the 2013 edition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with the Maple software for solving differential equations
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation techniques
  • Ability to manipulate and rearrange mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to solve first-order differential equations by hand
  • Explore the use of Maple 2013 for solving differential equations
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions on differential equation solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone interested in solving differential equations, particularly those using Maple software.

Mathman2013
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
solving the following ODE (Hard)
Relevant Equations
R'(t)=k*4*pi*R(t)^2
I have the following DE, R'(t) = k*4*pi*R(t)^2, where R(0) = 5, and R'(0) =-0.001. I have attempted to solve it Maple, and would like to know if I have done it correctly?
maple_file.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathman2013 said:
would like to know if I have done it correctly
The way to check that you (Maple?) have done it correctly is to differentiate twice and see if it matches !
You don't need PF to do that for you, do you :wink: ?

[edit] and what about entry 1 ?
[edit2] Strike the 'twice' o:) :wink: .

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
The way to check that you (Maple?) have done it correctly is to differentiate twice and see if it matches !
You don't need PF to do that for you, do you :wink: ?

[edit] and what about entry 1 ?

##\ ##

I can't find k if I select entry 1.
 
How wold you go about if you had to solve this DE yourself ?

You mention 'hard' but it really isn't difficult ...

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
The way to check that you (Maple?) have done it correctly is to differentiate twice and see if it matches !
The DE is first order, so the OP needs only to differentiate the solution function once.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
This DE is solvable by hand. Notice that the original equation can be written as
dR/R^2 = Constant*dt
 
BvU said:
What are you asking?
 
BvU said:
How wold you go about if you had to solve this DE yourself ?
 
  • #10
Wrong mathman. You want the 2013 edition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #11
Oops ! o:) sorry.
 
  • #12
If this DE is hard, I wonder what this topic looks like when the variables are not separable :P
 
  • #13

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
969
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K